Role of insulin resistance in predicting progression to type 1 diabetes

被引:85
作者
Xu, Ping
Cuthbertson, David
Greenbaum, Carla
Palmer, Jerry P.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Pediat Epidemiol Ctr, Div Informat & Biostat, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Benaroya Res Inst Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Vet Affairs Puget Sound, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc06-2389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to determine whether insulin resistance is a risk factor for the development of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive first-degree relatives of diabetic family members. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Subjects (n = 186) who had a projected 25-50% risk for diabetes and subjects (n = 170) who had a projected > 50% risk for type 1 diabetes in 5 years were followed until clinical diabetes onset or the end of the study as part of the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. We assessed insulin secretion with the first-phase insulin response (FPIR) and insulin resistance with homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from an intravenous glucose tolerance test. The median follow-up was 4.3 years for moderate-risk subjects and 3.7 years for high-risk subjects. RESULTS- During the follow-up period, 53 subjects in the moderate-risk group and 70 subjects in the high-risk group developed type 1 diabetes. After adjustments for confounders using multivariate analysis, HOMA-IR and the FPIR-to-HOMA-IR ratio were significantly associated with type 1 diabetes in both risk groups. in the moderate-risk population, the hazard ratio (HR) of HOMA-IR was 2.70 (95% CI 1.45-5.06) and the HR of FPIR-to-HOMA-IR was 0.32 (95% CI 0.18-0.57). in the high-risk population, the HR of HOMA-IR was 1.83 (95% CI 1.19-2.82) and the HR of FPIR-to-HOMA-IR was 0.56 (95% CI 0.40-0.78). CONCLUSIONS - There is clear evidence of the association between insulin resistance and progression to type 1 diabetes. The combination of FPIR and HOMA-IR could be used as a better metabolic indicator for type 1 diabetes risk for prediction and suggests possible intervention strategies for diabetes prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:2314 / 2320
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Both insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance in children and young adults with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes vary with growth hormone concentrations and with age
    Acerini, CL
    Cheetham, TD
    Edge, JA
    Dunger, DB
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2000, 43 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [2] STANDARDIZATION OF IVGTT TO PREDICT IDDM
    BINGLEY, PJ
    COLMAN, P
    EISENBARTH, GS
    JACKSON, RA
    MCCULLOCH, DK
    RILEY, WJ
    GALE, EAM
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (10) : 1313 - 1316
  • [3] Islet autoantibodies and their use in predicting insulin-dependent diabetes
    Bonifacio, E
    Bingley, PJ
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 1997, 34 (03) : 185 - 193
  • [4] First-phase insulin release during the intravenous glucose tolerance test as a risk factor for type 1 diabetes
    Chase, HP
    Cuthbertson, DD
    Dolan, LM
    Kaufman, F
    Krischer, JP
    Schatz, DA
    White, NH
    Wilson, DM
    Wolfsdorf, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 138 (02) : 244 - 249
  • [5] *DIAB PREV TRIAL T, 2005, DIABETES CARE, V28, P1068
  • [6] Eisenbarth GS, 2004, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V552, P268
  • [7] Insulin resistance is a risk factor for progression to Type 1 diabetes
    Fourlanos, S
    Narendran, P
    Byrnes, GB
    Colman, PG
    Harrison, LC
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 (10) : 1661 - 1667
  • [8] Insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes
    Greenbaum, CJ
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2002, 18 (03) : 192 - 200
  • [9] Relationship of β-cell function and autoantibodies to progression and nonprogression of subclinical type 1 diabetes -: Follow-up of the Seattle Family Study
    Greenbaum, CJ
    Sears, KL
    Kahn, SE
    Palmer, JP
    [J]. DIABETES, 1999, 48 (01) : 170 - 175
  • [10] Type 1 diabetes manifested solely by 2-h oral glucose tolerance test criteria
    Greenbaum, CJ
    Cuthbertson, D
    Krischer, JP
    [J]. DIABETES, 2001, 50 (02) : 470 - 476