Levobupivacaine 0.75% vs. lidocaine 4% for topical anaesthesia: a clinical comparison in cataract surgery

被引:7
作者
Di Donato, A. [1 ]
Fontana, C. [1 ]
Lancia, F. [1 ]
Di Giorgio, K. [1 ]
Reali, S. [1 ]
Caricati, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Hosp Special Surg, Dept Anesthesia Resuscitat & Pain Management, Rome, Italy
关键词
lidocaine; levobupivacaine; surgery; ophthalmic; cataract; anaesthesia local;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021506002018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of topical levobupivacaine drops 0.75% vs. lidocaine drops 4% in cataract surgery. Methods: We examined 203 patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. They were randomized into two groups: one received four drops of lidocaine 4% and the other received four drops of levobupivacaine 0.75%. The onset and offset times of sensory block were evaluated. Application, intraoperative and postoperative subjective pain was quantified by the patients using a verbal pain score. Complications, rates of supplemental anaesthesia, and the satisfaction of surgeon and patients were also recorded. Results: The mean sensory onset and offset times were significantly higher for the levobupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Pain score was lower in the levobupivacaine group than in the lidocaine one and the difference was statistically significant at all stages (P < 0.01). The mean satisfaction scores of patients and surgeon were also statistically higher for levobupivacaine (P < 0.01). No significant differences for complications and rates of supplemental anaesthesia were found. Conclusions: Topical levobupivacaine 0.75% shows the same efficacy and safety as lidocaine 4% in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. There was an adequate block with a good level of satisfaction of surgeon and patients. Levobupivacaine 0.75% offers a new and acceptable choice for topical anaesthesia in cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 440
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Lidocaine 2% gel versus lidocaine 4% unpreserved drops for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery -: A randomized controlled trial
    Bardocci, A
    Lofoco, G
    Perdicaro, S
    Ciucci, F
    Manna, L
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) : 144 - 149
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of 0.75% levobupivacaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia
    Birt, DJ
    Cummings, GC
    [J]. EYE, 2003, 17 (02) : 200 - 206
  • [3] Efficacy and comparison of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 0.75% ropivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery
    Di Donato, A
    Fontana, C
    Lancia, E
    Celleno, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (06) : 487 - 490
  • [4] Levobupivacaine - A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic
    Foster, RH
    Markham, A
    [J]. DRUGS, 2000, 59 (03) : 551 - 579
  • [5] Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep
    Huang, YF
    Pryor, ME
    Mather, LE
    Veering, BT
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04) : 797 - 804
  • [6] Lebuisson DA, 1996, J FR OPHTALMOL, V19, P181
  • [7] Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery
    Martini, E
    Cavallini, GM
    Campi, L
    Lugli, N
    Neri, G
    Molinari, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (06) : 1018 - 1022
  • [8] A comparison of lidocaine 2% with levobupivacaine 0.75% for sub-Tenon's block
    McLure, HA
    Kumar, CM
    Ahmed, S
    Patel, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 22 (07) : 500 - 503
  • [9] MCLURE HA, 1998, ANESTHESIA, V53, P1060
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after the surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline
    Rood, JP
    Coulthard, P
    Snowdon, AT
    Gennery, BA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 40 (06) : 491 - 496