Levobupivacaine 0.75% vs. lidocaine 4% for topical anaesthesia: a clinical comparison in cataract surgery

被引:7
作者
Di Donato, A. [1 ]
Fontana, C. [1 ]
Lancia, F. [1 ]
Di Giorgio, K. [1 ]
Reali, S. [1 ]
Caricati, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Hosp Special Surg, Dept Anesthesia Resuscitat & Pain Management, Rome, Italy
关键词
lidocaine; levobupivacaine; surgery; ophthalmic; cataract; anaesthesia local;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021506002018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of topical levobupivacaine drops 0.75% vs. lidocaine drops 4% in cataract surgery. Methods: We examined 203 patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. They were randomized into two groups: one received four drops of lidocaine 4% and the other received four drops of levobupivacaine 0.75%. The onset and offset times of sensory block were evaluated. Application, intraoperative and postoperative subjective pain was quantified by the patients using a verbal pain score. Complications, rates of supplemental anaesthesia, and the satisfaction of surgeon and patients were also recorded. Results: The mean sensory onset and offset times were significantly higher for the levobupivacaine group (P < 0.01). Pain score was lower in the levobupivacaine group than in the lidocaine one and the difference was statistically significant at all stages (P < 0.01). The mean satisfaction scores of patients and surgeon were also statistically higher for levobupivacaine (P < 0.01). No significant differences for complications and rates of supplemental anaesthesia were found. Conclusions: Topical levobupivacaine 0.75% shows the same efficacy and safety as lidocaine 4% in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. There was an adequate block with a good level of satisfaction of surgeon and patients. Levobupivacaine 0.75% offers a new and acceptable choice for topical anaesthesia in cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 440
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Lidocaine 2% gel versus lidocaine 4% unpreserved drops for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery -: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bardocci, A ;
Lofoco, G ;
Perdicaro, S ;
Ciucci, F ;
Manna, L .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) :144-149
[2]   The efficacy and safety of 0.75% levobupivacaine vs 0.75% bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia [J].
Birt, DJ ;
Cummings, GC .
EYE, 2003, 17 (02) :200-206
[3]   Efficacy and comparison of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 0.75% ropivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery [J].
Di Donato, A ;
Fontana, C ;
Lancia, E ;
Celleno, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (06) :487-490
[4]   Levobupivacaine - A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic [J].
Foster, RH ;
Markham, A .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (03) :551-579
[5]   Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep [J].
Huang, YF ;
Pryor, ME ;
Mather, LE ;
Veering, BT .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (04) :797-804
[6]  
Lebuisson DA, 1996, J FR OPHTALMOL, V19, P181
[7]   Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery [J].
Martini, E ;
Cavallini, GM ;
Campi, L ;
Lugli, N ;
Neri, G ;
Molinari, P .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (06) :1018-1022
[8]   A comparison of lidocaine 2% with levobupivacaine 0.75% for sub-Tenon's block [J].
McLure, HA ;
Kumar, CM ;
Ahmed, S ;
Patel, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 22 (07) :500-503
[9]  
MCLURE HA, 1998, ANESTHESIA, V53, P1060
[10]   Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after the surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline [J].
Rood, JP ;
Coulthard, P ;
Snowdon, AT ;
Gennery, BA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 40 (06) :491-496