Role of Tear Osmolarity in Dry Eye Symptoms After Cataract Surgery

被引:20
作者
Gonzalez-Mesa, Ana [1 ]
Moreno-Arrones, Javier Paz [1 ]
Ferrari, Daniele [1 ]
Teus, Miguel A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Principe Asturias, Alcala De Henares, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala De Henares, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; FILM OSMOLARITY; RISK-FACTORS; PREVALENCE; CORNEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.002
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To analyze changes in tear osmolarity and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) in patients after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: SETTING: Institutional. PATIENT POPULATION: Fifty-two patients with a unilateral cataract (study eye) scheduled for surgery and good visual function in the fellow (control eye). Patients were excluded who were receiving chronic topical therapy, such as glaucoma medications, or had a history of previous ocular surgery. INTERVENTION: Examinations were performed preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. At each visit, complete anterior and posterior segment examinations were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best corrected and uncorrected visual acuities, tear osmolarity, and OSDI scores. RESULTS: The mean tear osmolarity values were, respectively, 305.63 +/- 15.07, 305.70 +/- 16.48, and 303.88 +/- 11.75 mOsm/L at baseline and 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P = .067), compared with 309.74 +/- 15.92, 306.74 +/- 13.22, and 303.19 +/- 11.02 mOsm/L at the same times in the unoperated control eyes (P = .064). Patients with normal osmolarity (< 312 mOsm/L) and hyperosmolarity values (312 mOsm/L) had respective OSDI scores of 22.77 +/- 15.73 and 36.02 +/- 12.20 at baseline (P = .01), 12.44 +/- 12.44 and 14.45 +/- 13.45 at 1 month (P = .7), and 10.37 +/- 11.11 and 16.48 +/- 8.08 at 3 months postoperatively (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find differences in tear film osmolarity between the operated eyes and the fellow unoperated control eyes at any time period during the study. Patients with tear osmolarity values of 312 mOsm/L or higher are more likely to have more ocular discomfort postoperatively. Ophthalmologists should consider evaluating tear " osmolarity preoperatively, especially in highly demanding patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Tear fluid hyperosmolality increases nerve impulse activity of cold thermoreceptor endings of the cornea
    Parra, Andres
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Omar
    Gallar, Juana
    Belmonte, Carlos
    [J]. PAIN, 2014, 155 (08) : 1481 - 1491
  • [12] Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index
    Schiffman, RM
    Christianson, MD
    Jacobsen, G
    Hirsch, JD
    Reis, BL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 118 (05) : 615 - 621
  • [13] An Objective Approach to Dry Eye Disease Severity
    Sullivan, Benjamin D.
    Whitmer, Diane
    Nichols, Kelly K.
    Tomlinson, Alan
    Foulks, Gary N.
    Geerling, Gerd
    Pepose, Jay S.
    Kosheleff, Valerie
    Porreco, Allison
    Lemp, Michael A.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (12) : 6125 - 6130
  • [14] Tear film osmolarity: Determination of a referent for dry eye diagnosis
    Tomlinson, Alan
    Khanal, Santosh
    Ramaesh, Kanna
    Diaper, Charles
    McFadyen, Angus
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (10) : 4309 - 4315
  • [15] Comparison of Human Tear Film Osmolarity Measured by Electrical Impedance and Freezing Point Depression Techniques
    Tomlinson, Alan
    McCann, Louise C.
    Pearce, Edward I.
    [J]. CORNEA, 2010, 29 (09) : 1036 - 1041
  • [16] Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease in a British female cohort
    Vehof, Jelle
    Kozareva, Diana
    Hysi, Pirro G.
    Hammond, Christopher J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (12) : 1712 - 1717
  • [17] Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Woodward, Maria A.
    Randleman, J. Bradley
    Stulting, R. Doyle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (06) : 992 - 997