Effects of Kocide 101® on the bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) -: Rhizobium symbiosis

被引:5
作者
Baijukya, FP
Semu, E
机构
[1] Sokoine Univ Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Morogoro, Tanzania
[2] Maruku Agr Res Inst, Bukoba, Tanzania
关键词
beans; Kocide; 101; nitrogen fixation; nodulation; rhizobia; symbiosis;
D O I
10.1080/09064719809362496
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A glasshouse study was undertaken to investigate the effects of the copper fungicide Kocide 101 and its residues in soil on the growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). The soil used was a sandy clay loam classified as Typic Rhodustalf. The bean variety SUA 90 was used as test crop. The bean rhizobia strains CIAT 899, PV1 and a local isolate were used. Kocide 101 applied at the recommended rate (equivalent to 1.7 mg kg(-1) soil) had no significant negative effects on the growth, nodulation or nitrogen fixation of bean plants. Higher levels of Kocide 101 significantly (P < 0.05) reduced plant growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation. The bean plants inoculated with the "local isolate" rhizobia had the highest dry matter weights, nodule numbers and nodule dry weights, and also had more N fixation. They were followed by those inoculated with the PV1 strain and, lastly, those inoculated with CIAT 899. The growth and nodulation of bean plants were still curtailed by the Kocide 101 residues four months after the fungicide was first applied to the soil. Therefore, occurrence of high levels of Kocide 101 in soils can have long-term effects on the performance of the bean-rhizobia symbiosis.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 183
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis: overview and perspectives
    Esperanza Martínez-Romero
    Plant and Soil, 2003, 252 : 11 - 23
  • [2] Inoculation with Rhizobium spp. in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties
    Kucuk, Cigdem
    ZEMDIRBYSTE-AGRICULTURE, 2011, 98 (01) : 49 - 56
  • [3] Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis:: overview and perspectives
    Martínez-Romero, E
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2003, 252 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [4] Intercropping and Rhizobium Inoculation Affected Microclimate and Performance of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties
    Shumet, Shemeles Tesfaye
    Ayalew, Tewodros
    Roro, Amsalu Gobena
    Beshir, Hussien Mohammed
    SCIENTIFICA, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Analysis of the Proteome of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Roots after Inoculation with Rhizobium etli
    Salavati, Afshin
    Taleei, Alireza
    Bushehri, Ali Akbar Shahnejat
    Komatsu, Setsuko
    PROTEIN AND PEPTIDE LETTERS, 2012, 19 (08) : 880 - 889
  • [6] Effects of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar and rhizobium strain on plant growth, seed yield and nitrogen content
    Buttery, BR
    Park, SJ
    vanBerkum, P
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1997, 77 (03) : 347 - 351
  • [7] Impact of microbial consortium of Rhizobium tropici and Rhizobium mayense on the growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L.
    Mir, Mohammad Imran
    Mukkamula, Nagaraju
    Kumar, B. Kiran
    Raghu, K.
    Parray, Javid A.
    Khan, Ira
    Hameeda, Bee
    Babalola, Olubukola Oluranti
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 168 : 562 - 572
  • [8] Effects of different salt concentrations and Rhizobium inoculation (native and Rhizobium tropici CIAT899) on growth of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Uyanoz, Refik
    Karaca, Ummuhan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2011, 47 (06) : 387 - 391
  • [9] Is it worth inoculating common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)?
    Kellman, Anthony W.
    Hill, George D.
    McKenzie, Bruce A.
    AGRONOMY NEW ZEALAND, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 36 : 24 - +
  • [10] Seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris bean carry Rhizobium etli
    Pérez-Ramírez, NO
    Rogel, MA
    Wang, E
    Castellanos, JZ
    Martínez-Romero, E
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 1998, 26 (04) : 289 - 296