Characteristics and Distinguishing Features of Hepatocellular Adenoma and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI

被引:60
作者
Purysko, Andrei S. [1 ]
Remer, Erick M. [1 ]
Coppa, Christopher P. [1 ]
Obuchowski, Nancy A. [1 ]
Schneider, Erika [1 ]
Veniero, Joseph C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Sect Abdominal Imaging, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
focal nodular hyperplasia; gadoxetate disodium; hepatocellular adenoma; MRI; GD-EOB-DTPA; HEPATIC ADENOMA; CONTRAST AGENT; LIVER; DIFFERENTIATION; CT; CLASSIFICATION; TRANSFORMATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.11.6836
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI in the characterization of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma and to assess potential advantages of hepatocyte phase imaging in identifying features that distinguish FNH from hepatocellular adenoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI examinations of 12 patients with hepatocellular adenoma and 35 patients with FNH were retrospectively evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnoses and confidence scores were recorded before and after disclosure of hepatocyte phase images. The data obtained were combined to create receiver operating characteristic curves, and the areas under the curves were compared. Imaging characteristics, including signal intensity, were recorded. Lesion-to-liver enhancement ratio was calculated for each contrast-enhanced phase. RESULTS. The readers' average receiver operating characteristic area was significantly higher after disclosure of hepatocyte phase images (p = 0.024). FNHs were correctly diagnosed in 74.3-97.1% of cases before and 97.1-100% of cases after the disclosure of hepatocyte phase images; hepatocellular adenoma was correctly diagnosed in 83-100% and 91.7-100% of cases (p > 0.05). The presence of a central scar in FNH and fat on hepatocellular adenoma were the only morphologic features that were statistically significantly different (p < 0.05). FNH had greater average contrast-enhanced signal intensity and enhancement ratio in all phases (p < 0.001). A hepatocyte phase enhancement ratio of less than 0.7 was 100% specific and 91.6% sensitive for hepatocellular adenoma, with accuracy of 97.1% for these data. CONCLUSION. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had high accuracy in diagnosis of FNH and hepatocellular adenoma, and the hepatocyte phase improved their distinction. FNH enhances significantly more than hepatocellular adenoma. An enhancement ratio, particularly in the hepatocyte phase, can be potentially used as an additional distinguishing feature.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   HEPATIC ADENOMA - MR FINDINGS IN 51 PATHOLOGICALLY PROVED LESIONS [J].
ARRIVE, L ;
FLEJOU, JF ;
VILGRAIN, V ;
BELGHITI, J ;
NAJMARK, D ;
ZINS, M ;
MENU, Y ;
TUBIANA, JM ;
NAHUM, H .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :507-512
[2]   Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: comparison of power Doppler imaging and conventional color Doppler sonography [J].
Bartolozzi, C ;
Lencioni, R ;
Paolicchi, A ;
Moretti, M ;
Armillotta, N ;
Pinto, F .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (09) :1410-1415
[3]   Hepatocellular adenoma subtype classification using molecular markers and lmmunohistochemistry [J].
Bioulac-Sage, Paulette ;
Rebouissou, Sandra ;
Thomas, Cristel ;
Blanc, Jean-Frederic ;
Saric, Jean ;
Cunha, Antonio Sa ;
Ruiller, Anne ;
Cubel, Gaeelle ;
Couchy, Gabrielle ;
Imbeaud, Sandrine ;
Balabaud, Charles ;
Zucman-Rossi, Jessica .
HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (03) :740-748
[4]   Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: US Multicenter Phase III study [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Sahani, D ;
Amendola, M ;
Balzer, T ;
Breuer, J ;
Brown, JJ ;
Casalino, DD ;
Davis, PL ;
Francis, IR ;
Krinsky, G ;
Lee, FT ;
Lu, D ;
Paulson, EK ;
Schwartz, LH ;
Siegelman, ES .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :89-98
[5]   Surgical management of hepatocellular adenoma: Take it or leave it? [J].
Cho, Sung W. ;
Marsh, J. Wallis ;
Steel, Jennifer ;
Holloway, Shane E. ;
Heckman, Jason T. ;
Ochoa, Erin R. ;
Geller, David A. ;
Gamblin, T. Clark .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) :2795-2803
[6]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[7]   Intraindividual Comparison of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging and 64-Section Multidetector CT in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis [J].
Di Martino, Michele ;
Marin, Daniele ;
Guerrisi, Antonino ;
Baski, Mahbubeh ;
Galati, Francesca ;
Rossi, Massimo ;
Brozzetti, Stefania ;
Masciangelo, Raffaele ;
Passariello, Roberto ;
Catalano, Carlo .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (03) :806-816
[8]   Hepatic arterial-phase dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: Optimization with a test examination and a power injector [J].
Earls, JP ;
Rofsky, NM ;
DeCorato, DR ;
Krinsky, GA ;
Weinreb, JC .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (01) :268-273
[9]   Malignant Transformation of Liver Adenoma: An Analysis of the Literature [J].
Farges, Olivier ;
Dokmak, Safi .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 27 (01) :32-38
[10]   MRI of hepatic adenomatosis: Initial observations with gadoxetic acid contrast agent in three patients [J].
Giovanoli, Olivier ;
Heim, Markus ;
Terracciano, Luigi ;
Bongartz, Georg ;
Ledermann, Hans P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (05) :W290-W293