Impact of trauma centre accreditation on mortality and complications in a Canadian trauma system: an interrupted time series analysis

被引:9
作者
Batomen, Brice [1 ]
Moore, Lynne [2 ]
Strumpf, Erin [1 ,3 ]
Champion, Howard [4 ]
Nandi, Arijit [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A2, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Social & Prevent Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Econ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[5] Inst Hlth & Social Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
accreditation; audit and feedback; health services research; quality improvement; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; SURGEONS-VERIFICATION; MAJOR TRAUMA; OUTCOMES; CARE; PERFORMANCE; REGRESSION; DESIGNATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011271
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Periodic external accreditation visits aiming to determine whether trauma centres are fulfilling the criteria for optimal care are part of most trauma systems. However, despite the growing trend towards accreditation of trauma centres, its impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. In addition, a recent systematic review found inconsistent results on the association between accreditation and patient outcomes, mostly due to the lack of robust controls. We aim to address these gaps by assessing the impact of trauma centre accreditation on patient outcomes, specifically in-hospital mortality and complications, using an interrupted time series (ITS) design. Methods We included all major trauma admissions to five level I and four level II trauma centres in Quebec, Canada between 2008 and 2017. In order to perform ITS, we first obtained monthly and quarterly estimates of the proportions of in-hospital mortality and complications, respectively, for level I and level II centres. Prognostic scores were used to standardise these proportions to account for changes in patient case mix and segmented regressions with autocorrelated errors were used to estimate changes in levels and trends in both outcomes following accreditation. Results There were 51 035 admissions, including 20 165 for major trauma during the study period. After accounting for changes in patient case mix and secular trend in studied outcomes, we globally did not observe an association between accreditation and patient outcomes. However, associations were heterogeneous across centres. For example, in a level II centre with worsening preaccreditation outcomes, accreditation led to -9.08 (95% CI -13.29 to -4.87) and -9.60 (95% CI -15.77 to -3.43) percentage point reductions in mortality and complications, respectively. Conclusion Accreditation seemed to be beneficial for centres that were experiencing a decrease in performance preceding accreditation.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 866
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Accreditation Canada, 2014, TRAUM DIST INF PACK
[2]   ACS Verified Level I Centers Have Better Clinical Outcomes Than State Designated Level I Trauma Centers [J].
Agrawal, Vaidehi ;
Deramo, Paul J. ;
Lowrance, Emily ;
Chae, Chanhee Jo ;
Amos, Joseph Darryl .
TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2018, 23 (06)
[3]  
American College of Surgeons, 2018, RESOURCES OPTIMAL CA
[4]  
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma., 2014, RESOURCES OPTIMAL CA, V6th
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, RESOURCES OPTIMAL CA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Multiple Imputations for Non Response in Surveys
[7]  
Ashley DW, 2017, AM SURGEON, V83, P979
[8]  
Batomen B., 2020, CAN J SURG
[9]   A methodological framework for model selection in interrupted time series studies [J].
Bernal, J. Lopez ;
Soumerai, S. ;
Gasparrini, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 103 :82-91
[10]   Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial [J].
Bernal, James Lopez ;
Cummins, Steven ;
Gasparrini, Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (01) :348-355