Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) with the intravesical administration of the ultrasound contrast agent Optison™ for vesicoureteral reflux detection in children: a prospective clinical trial

被引:42
作者
Ntoulia, Aikaterini [1 ]
Back, Susan J. [1 ,2 ]
Shellikeri, Sphoorti [1 ]
Poznick, Laura [1 ]
Morgan, Trudy [1 ]
Kerwood, Joanne [1 ]
Edgar, J. Christopher [1 ,2 ]
Bellah, Richard D. [1 ,2 ]
Reid, Janet R. [1 ,2 ]
Jaramillo, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Canning, Douglas A. [2 ,3 ]
Darge, Kassa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Radiol, 34th St & Civ Ctr Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography; Contrast agent; Optison (TM); Vesicoureteral reflux; Diagnosis; Grading; Children; DIAGNOSIS; CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-017-4026-3
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS) is widely used outside the United States to diagnose vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children and is highly sensitive while avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation. At the onset of this study, two ultrasound (US) contrast agents were available in the United States. Pediatric safety data for intravenous administration was published for one, Optison (TM). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of ceVUS using Optison (TM) and compare its diagnostic efficacy with voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) for VUR detection and grading in children. The United States Food and Drug Administration and institutional Investigational New Drug authorizations were obtained to conduct a prospective comparative study of ceVUS with Optison (TM) and VCUG. CeVUS was performed with intravesical administration of 0.2% Optison (TM)/normal saline solution. A standard VCUG followed. Safety assessment included physical examination, and heart rate, pulse oximetry and adverse reactions monitoring before, during and immediately after the examinations. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by telephone 48-h after the studies. Sixty-two pelviureteric units were studied in 30 patients with a mean age of 3.5 years (range: 0.1-17 years) including 21 girls and 9 boys. No severe adverse events occurred. All patients had normal heart rate and blood oxygenation saturation prior to, during and after the studies. At the 48-h follow-up, one patient (3.3%) reported transient dysuria. Taking the VCUG as the reference standard, ceVUS had a sensitivity of 91.7% (95%; confidence interval [CI]: 61.5%-99.8%) and specificity of 98% (95%; CI: 89.4%-99.9%). The concordance between ceVUS and VCUG for VUR detection and grading was 84.3% and 81.8%, respectively. VUR grades were discrepant in 4/11 refluxing pelviureteric units, with VCUG upgrading VUR in 2. Detection of VUR with Optison (TM) ceVUS was comparable to VCUG without exposure to ionizing radiation. CeVUS with Optison (TM) is a well-tolerated diagnostic procedure with a favorable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent [J].
Ascenti, G ;
Zimbaro, G ;
Mazziotti, S ;
Chimenz, R ;
Fede, C ;
Visalli, C ;
Scribano, E .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (06) :481-487
[2]  
Babu Ramesh, 2015, J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg, V20, P40, DOI 10.4103/0971-9261.145548
[3]   Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography: in vitro evaluation of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for in vivo optimization [J].
Back, Susan J. ;
Edgar, J. Christopher ;
Canning, Douglas A. ;
Darge, Kassa .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (10) :1496-1505
[4]   Vesicoureteral refux detection in children: a comparison of the midline-to-orifice distance measurement by ultrasound and voiding urosonography [J].
Battelino, Nina ;
Kljucevsek, Damjana ;
Tomazic, Mojca ;
Levart, Tanja Kersnik .
PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 31 (06) :957-964
[5]   Safety of Ultrasound Contrast Agents in the Pediatric Oncologic Population: A Single-Institution Experience [J].
Coleman, Jamie L. ;
Navid, Fariba ;
Furman, Wayne L. ;
McCarville, M. Beth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (05) :966-970
[6]   Residual intravesical iodinated contrast: a potential cause of false-negative reflux study at contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography [J].
Colleran, Gabrielle C. ;
Paltiel, Harriet J. ;
Barnewolt, Carol E. ;
Chow, Jeanne S. .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (11) :1614-1617
[7]   Intrarenal Reflux Diagnosis at Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography [J].
Colleran, Gabrielle C. ;
Barnewolt, Carol E. ;
Chow, Jeanne S. ;
Paltiel, Harriet J. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (08) :1811-1819
[8]   Vesicoureteral reflux grading in contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography [J].
Darge, K ;
Troeger, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) :122-128
[9]  
Darge K., 2004, Pediatr. Radiol, V34, P97, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00247-003-1082-7
[10]   Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children [J].
Darge, Kassa .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 38 (01) :40-53