The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain

被引:31
作者
Du, Xianjin [1 ]
Zhan, Huimin [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaoxuan [2 ]
He, Xiuli [3 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[3] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Belk Coll Business, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2021年 / 105卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Overconfidence; Overestimation; Upstream innovation; Cost-sharing contract; Wholesale price contract; QUALITY-IMPROVEMENT; CEO OVERCONFIDENCE; PRICE; COMPETITION; DECISION; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2021.102497
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Overconfidence is a common, pervasive cognitive bias that is of great practical importance in decision-making and widely recognized as an influential factor to consider in operations management. In this paper, we consider overconfidence bias in a supply chain innovation scenario, which consists of an innovative upstream supplier and an overconfident downstream manufacturer overestimating the impact of innovation to enhance demand. We investigate the influence of the manufacturer's overconfidence on supplier innovation and supply chain profits under the wholesale price contract and the cost-sharing contract settings. Our results suggest that while the overconfidence is detrimental to the supplier's innovation under a wholesale price contract, it is beneficial to the supplier's innovation under a cost-sharing contract, and even more beneficial than in the centralized case. We also find that, under a wholesale price contract the manufacturer's profit can be higher than under a cost-sharing contract when the level of overconfidence exceeds a certain threshold. Interestingly, we further find that the supplier's unawareness of overconfidence benefits both biased supply chain members under a wholesale price contract but shows the opposite effect for a cost-sharing contract. Our results offer insights into overconfidence bias in operations management and provide practical decision-making advice for supply chain members. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making
[2]  
Arlbjorn Jan S., 2011, Logistics Research, V3, P3, DOI 10.1007/s12159-010-0044-3
[3]   Cooperative advertising models in supply chain management: A review [J].
Aust, Gerhard ;
Buscher, Udo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 234 (01) :1-14
[4]   ' Innovation and technology diffusion in competitive supply chains [J].
Aydin, Ayhan ;
Parker, Rodney P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 265 (03) :1102-1114
[5]   Quality and competition [J].
Banker, RD ;
Khosla, I ;
Sinha, KK .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (09) :1179-1192
[6]   Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future [J].
Barreto, Ilidio .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (01) :256-280
[7]   Dynamic Cost Reduction Through Process Improvement in Assembly Networks [J].
Bernstein, Fernando ;
Koek, A. Guerhan .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (04) :552-567
[8]   Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development [J].
Bhaskaran, Sreekumar R. ;
Krishnan, V. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (07) :1152-1169
[9]   Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition [J].
Chakraborty, Tulika ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Ouhimmou, Mustapha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 208 :566-587
[10]   The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains' sustainability innovation [J].
Chen , Jen-Yi ;
Dimitrov, Stanko ;
Pun, Hubert .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 86 :42-58