Classical benchmarking for microwave quantum illumination

被引:8
|
作者
Karsa, Athena [1 ,2 ]
Pirandola, Stefano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Comp Sci, York, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Comp Sci, York YO10 5GH, England
来源
IET QUANTUM COMMUNICATION | 2021年 / 2卷 / 04期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
photons; quantum information; quantum noise; quantum optics; quantum theory; DISCRETE LOGARITHMS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATION; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1049/qtc2.12025
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum illumination theoretically promises up to a 6 dB error-exponent advantage in target detection over the best classical protocol. The advantage is maximised by a regime that includes a very high background, which occurs naturally when one considers microwave operation. Such a regime has well-known practical limitations, though it is clear that, theoretically, knowledge of the associated classical benchmark in the microwave is lacking. The requirement of amplifiers for signal detection necessarily renders the optimal classical protocol here different to that which is traditionally used, and only applicable in the optical domain. This work outlines what is the true classical benchmark for the microwave Quantum illumination using coherent states, providing new bounds on error probability and closed formulae for the receiver operating characteristic, for both optimal (based on quantum relative entropy) and homodyne detection schemes. An alternative source generation procedure based on coherent states is also proposed, which demonstrates the potential to make classically optimal performances achievable in optical applications. The same bounds and measures for the performance of such a source are provided, and its potential utility in the future of room temperature quantum detection schemes in the microwave is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 257
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantum Mechanics and Classical Optics: New Ways to Combine Classical and Quantum Methods
    Konrad, T.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM PHENOMENA, QUANTUM CONTROL AND QUANTUM OPTICS, QUANTUM FEST 2021, 2023, 2448
  • [22] The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
    McClean, Jarrod R.
    Romero, Jonathan
    Babbush, Ryan
    Aspuru-Guzik, Alan
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2016, 18
  • [23] Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features
    Rolino, Davide
    Erba, Marco
    Tosini, Alessandro
    Perinotti, Paolo
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2025, 27 (02):
  • [24] Classical and quantum algorithms for many-body problems
    Ayral, Thomas
    COMPTES RENDUS PHYSIQUE, 2025, 26
  • [25] Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum computer
    Wright, K.
    Beck, K. M.
    Debnath, S.
    Amini, J. M.
    Nam, Y.
    Grzesiak, N.
    Chen, J. -S.
    Pisenti, N. C.
    Chmielewski, M.
    Collins, C.
    Hudek, K. M.
    Mizrahi, J.
    Wong-Campos, J. D.
    Allen, S.
    Apisdorf, J.
    Solomon, P.
    Williams, M.
    Ducore, A. M.
    Blinov, A.
    Kreikemeier, S. M.
    Chaplin, V.
    Keesan, M.
    Monroe, C.
    Kim, J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [26] Benchmarking Quantum Annealing Controls with Portfolio Optimization
    Grant, Erica
    Humble, Travis S.
    Stump, Benjamin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2021, 15 (01):
  • [27] Classical and quantum control of a simple quantum system
    Xi, Zairong
    Jin, Guangsheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2007, 5 (06) : 857 - 884
  • [28] Quantum resources of quantum and classical variational methods
    Spriggs, Thomas
    Ahmadi, Arash
    Chen, Bokai
    Greplova, Eliska
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 6 (01):
  • [29] Classical command of quantum systems
    Reichardt, Ben W.
    Unger, Falk
    Vazirani, Umesh
    NATURE, 2013, 496 (7446) : 456 - 460
  • [30] Classical Models for Quantum Information
    Holik, Federico
    Martin Bosyk, Gustavo
    WHAT IS QUANTUM INFORMATION?, 2017, : 207 - 230