Comparison between inductive and resistive SFCL in terms of current limitation and power system transient stability

被引:39
作者
Didier, G. [1 ]
Bonnard, C. H. [1 ]
Lubin, T. [1 ]
Leveque, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, GREEN, F-54506 Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
关键词
Inductive superconducting fault current limiter; Resistive superconducting fault current limiter; Electrical power system; Current limitation; System stability; Short-circuit; FAULT CURRENT LIMITERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsr.2015.04.002
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In this paper, authors present a comparative study of inductive and resistive superconducting fault current limiters (SFCL) from current limitation and power system transient stability point of view. Different types of SFCL can be used to decrease the amplitude of fault current in a power system. The two most used are resistive type (rSFCL) and inductive type (iSFCL). However, no studies have been done to show the difference between them in term of current limitation and transient stability on a same power system. We propose here to compare rSFCL and iSFCL when a fault occurs in a simple high voltage (HV) power system (IEEE 3 bus test system). To evaluate the impact of SFCL in the studied power system, time domain approach is used to evaluate the short-circuit current in the electrical power system by solving the differential equations of such circuit configuration for various SFCL impedance. For the transient stability study, authors use an approach based on the equal area criterion to evaluate the critical clearing angle (CCA) and a time domain approach to evaluate the critical clearing time (CCT) for the two types of SFCL. Results show that the two SFCLs have different impacts on the power system. However, the resistive SFCL appears to be the more suitable to limit the fault current and to increase the transient stability of the power system in case of short-circuit. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 158
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Optimal Allocation of HTS-FCL for Power System Security and Stability Enhancement [J].
Alaraifi, Surour ;
El Moursi, M. S. ;
Zeineldin, H. H. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) :4701-4711
[2]  
Aly MM, 2012, 2012 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING & SYSTEMS (ICCES'2012), P227, DOI 10.1109/ICCES.2012.6408518
[3]   Analysis of electromagnetic forces in high voltage superconducting fault current limiters with saturated core [J].
Aracil, Jaime Cabanes ;
Lopez-Roldan, Jose ;
Coetzee, Jacob Carl ;
Darmann, Frank ;
Tang, Tee .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2012, 43 (01) :1087-1093
[4]   Proposal for an RMS thermoelectric model for a resistive-type superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) [J].
Costa Branco, P. J. ;
Almeida, M. E. ;
Dente, J. A. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (10) :1229-1239
[5]  
Cvoric D., 2008, TRANSM DISTR C EXP C, P1
[6]   A Novel Approach to Determine the Optimal Location of SFCL in Electric Power Grid to Improve Power System Stability [J].
Didier, G. ;
Leveque, Jean ;
Rezzoug, Abderrezak .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (02) :978-984
[7]  
Du H.-I., 2013, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, V23
[8]   Stability enhancement of multi-machine systems using adaptive reclosing of transmission lines [J].
Keyvani, B. ;
Zadeh, M. Karbalaye ;
Lesani, H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2014, 62 :391-397
[9]   Comparison of Inductive and Resistive SFCL [J].
Kozak, J. ;
Majka, M. ;
Kozak, S. ;
Janowski, T. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2013, 23 (03)
[10]   Tests results and analysis of inductive superconducting fault current limiter with Bi-2223 tube and HTS tape as secondary winding [J].
Kozak, J. ;
Janowski, T. ;
Kozak, S. ;
Wojtasiewicz, G. ;
Glowacki, B. .
7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (EUCAS'05), 2006, 43 :946-949