The Effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program in Primary Care A Randomized Trial

被引:38
作者
Potter, Michael B. [1 ]
Walsh, Judith M. E. [2 ]
Yu, Tina M. [1 ]
Gildengorin, Ginny [1 ]
Green, Lawrence W. [3 ,4 ]
McPhee, Stephen J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Helen Diller Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
INFLUENZA VACCINATION; CANCER; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The FLU-FOBT Program is an intervention in which nurses provide home fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) to eligible patients during annual influenza vaccination (FLU) campaigns. The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program when implemented during primary care visits has not been extensively studied. Purpose: The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT Program was tested as adapted for use during primary care visits in community clinics serving multiethnic patients with low baseline colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. Design: Randomized clinical trial. During intervention weeks, nurses routinely initiated the offering of FOBT to eligible patients who were given FLU (FLU-FOBT group). During control weeks, nurses provided FOBT with FLU only when ordered by the primary care clinician during usual care (FLU-only group). Setting/participants: The study was conducted in six community clinics in San Francisco. Participants were patients aged 50-75 years who received FLU during primary care visits during an 18-week intervention beginning on September 28, 2009. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the change in CRC screening rates in the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group at the end of the study period, on March 30, 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of becoming up-to-date with CRC screening. Results: Data were analyzed in 2010. A total of 695 participants received FLU on FLU-FOBT dates, and 677 received FLU on FLU-only dates. The CRC screening rate increased from 32.5% to 45.5% (+13.0 percentage points) in the FLU-FOBT group, and from 31.3% to 35.6% (+4.3 percentage points) in the FLU-only group (p=0.018 for change difference). For those due for CRC screening, the OR for completing CRC screening by the end of the measurement period was 2.22 (95% CI = 1.24, 3.95) for the FLU-FOBT group compared to the FLU-only group. Conclusions: FLU-FOBT Program participants were twice as likely to complete CRC screening as those receiving usual care. The FLU-FOBT Program is a practical strategy to increase CRC screening in community clinics.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CA CANC J CLIN
[2]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Harris, Russell ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Roseanne M. ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Yawn, Barbara P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :627-+
[3]   Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2006, Featuring Colorectal Cancer Trends and Impact of Interventions (Risk Factors, Screening, and Treatment) to Reduce Future Rates [J].
Edwards, Brenda K. ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Kohler, Betsy A. ;
Eheman, Christie ;
Zauber, Ann G. ;
Anderson, Robert N. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Schymura, Maria J. ;
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris ;
Seeff, Laura C. ;
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein ;
Goede, S. Luuk ;
Ries, Lynn A. G. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (03) :544-573
[4]   Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: Another approach to following the guidelines [J].
Fisher, JA ;
Fikry, C ;
Troxel, AB .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) :108-113
[5]   Systematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Holden, Debra J. ;
Jonas, Daniel E. ;
Porterfield, Deborah S. ;
Reuland, Daniel ;
Harris, Russell .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (10) :668-+
[6]  
IOM, 2002, COMM COMM BEH CHANG
[7]   Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: Innovative strategies and future directions [J].
Klabunde, Carrie N. ;
Lanier, David ;
Breslau, Erica S. ;
Zapka, Jane G. ;
Fletcher, Robert H. ;
Ransohoff, David F. ;
Winawer, Sidney J. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (08) :1195-1205
[8]  
Potter MB, 2011, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V22, P284, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2011.0030
[9]   Comparative effectiveness of two pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening interventions during an annual influenza vaccination campaign [J].
Potter, Michael B. ;
Gildengorin, Ginny ;
Wang, Yinan ;
Wu, May ;
Kroon, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 50 (02) :181-U92
[10]   Offering Annual Fecal Occult Blood Tests at Annual Flu Shot Clinics Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates [J].
Potter, Michael B. ;
Hudes, Esther S. ;
McPhee, Stepben J. ;
Walsh, Judith M. E. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (01) :17-23