Enhanced Recovery After Surgery strategies for elective craniotomy: a systematic review

被引:60
作者
Stumpo, Vittorio [2 ]
Staartjes, Victor E. [1 ,2 ]
Quddusi, Ayesha [3 ]
Corniola, Marco, V [4 ]
Tessitore, Enrico [4 ]
Schroder, Marc L. [5 ]
Anderer, Erich G. [6 ]
Stienen, Martin N. [1 ,7 ]
Serra, Carlo [1 ]
Regli, Luca [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Clin Neurosci Ctr, Dept Neurosurg,Machine Intelligence Clin Neurosci, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Neurosurg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Neurosci, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Geneva Univ Hosp HUG, Dept Neurosurg, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Bergman Clin Amsterdam, Dept Neurosurg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] NYU, Langone Hosp Brooklyn, Dept Neurosurg, Brooklyn, NY USA
[7] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Dept Neurosurg, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
elective; craniotomy; neurosurgery; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; fast track; short stay; VALUE-BASED NEUROSURGERY; BRAIN-TUMOR SURGERY; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; SUPRATENTORIAL CRANIOTOMY; INFRATENTORIAL CRANIOTOMY; SCALP BLOCK; PROPOFOL; DECOMPRESSION; REMIFENTANIL; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.3171/2020.10.JNS203160
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has led to a paradigm shift in perioperative care through multi modal interventions. Still, ERAS remains a relatively new concept in neurosurgery, and there is no summary of evidence on ERAS applications in cranial neurosurgery. METHODS The authors systematically reviewed the literature using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for ERAS protocols and elements. Studies had to assess at least one pre-, peri-, or postoperative ERAS element and evaluate at least one of the following outcomes: 1) length of hospital stay, 2) length of ICU stay, 3) postoperative pain, 4) direct and indirect healthcare cost, 5) complication rate, 6) readmission rate, or 7) patient satisfaction. RESULTS A final 27 articles were included in the qualitative analysis, with mixed quality of evidence ranging from high in 3 cases to very low in 1 case. Seventeen studies reported a complete ERAS protocol. Preoperative ERAS elements include patient selection through multidisciplinary team discussion, patient counseling and education to adjust expectations of the postoperative period, and mental state assessment; antimicrobial, steroidal, and antiepileptic prophylaxes; nutritional assessment, as well as preoperative oral carbohydrate loading; and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis. Anesthesiology interventions included local anesthesia for pin sites, regional field block or scalp block, avoidance or minimization of the duration of invasive monitoring, and limitation of intraoperative mannitol. Other intraoperative elements include absorbable skin sutures and avoidance of wound drains. Postoperatively, the authors identified early extubation, observation in a step-down unit instead of routine ICU admission, early mobilization, early fluid de-escalation, early intake of solid food and liquids, early removal of invasive monitoring, professional nutritional assessment, PONV management, nonopioid rescue analgesia, and early postoperative imaging. Other postoperative interventions included discharge criteria standardization and home visits or progress monitoring by a nurse. CONCLUSIONS A wide range of evidence-based interventions are available to improve recovery after elective craniotomy, although there are few published ERAS protocols. Patient-centered optimization of neurosurgical care spanning the pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods is feasible and has already provided positive results in terms of improved outcomes such as postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, reduced length of stay, and cost reduction with an excellent safety profile. Although fast-track recovery protocols and ERAS studies are gaining momentum for elective craniotomy, prospective trials are needed to provide stronger evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1857 / 1881
页数:25
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Which one is more effective for analgesia in infratentorial craniotomy? The scalp block or local anesthetic infiltration [J].
Akcil, Eren Fatma ;
Dilmen, Ozlem Korkmaz ;
Vehid, Hayriye ;
Ibisoglu, Lutfiye Serap ;
Tunali, Yusuf .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 154 :98-103
[2]   Use of regional scalp block for pain management after craniotomy: Review of literature and critical appraisal of evidence [J].
Akhigbe, T. ;
Zolnourian, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 45 :44-47
[3]   Outpatient brain tumor craniotomy under general anesthesia [J].
Au, Karolyn ;
Bharadwaj, Suparna ;
Venkatraghavan, Lashmi ;
Bernstein, Mark .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 125 (05) :1130-1135
[4]   Endoscopic and minimally invasive microsurgical approaches for treating brain tumor patients [J].
Badie, B ;
Brooks, N ;
Souweidane, MM .
JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 69 (1-3) :209-219
[5]   Comparative evaluation of propofol, sevoflurane and desflurane for neuroanaesthesia: A prospective randomised study in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy [J].
Bastola, Priska ;
Bhagat, Hemant ;
Wig, Jyotsna .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 59 (05) :287-294
[6]   Routine use of postoperative ICU care for elective craniotomy: A cost-benefit analysis [J].
Beauregard, CL ;
Friedman, WA .
SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (06) :483-489
[8]   Planning for early emergence in neurosurgical patients: A randomized prospective trial of low-dose anesthetics [J].
Bhagat, Hemant ;
Dash, Hari H. ;
Bithal, Parmod K. ;
Chouhan, Rajendra S. ;
Pandia, Mihir P. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (04) :1348-1355
[9]   Outpatient brain tumor surgery: innovation in surgical neurooncology [J].
Boulton, Mel ;
Bernstein, Mark .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 108 (04) :649-654
[10]  
Brock Stefano, 2016, Surg Neurol Int, V7, pS565, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.188471