Mixed methods study on the use of and attitudes towards safety checklists in interventional radiology

被引:5
作者
Munn, Zachary [1 ]
Giles, Kristy [1 ]
Aromataris, Edoardo [1 ]
Deakin, Anita [2 ,3 ]
Schultz, Timothy [2 ,3 ]
Mandel, Catherine [4 ,5 ]
Peters, Micah D. J. [1 ]
Maddern, Guy [6 ,7 ]
Pearson, Alan [1 ]
Runciman, William [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Joanna Briggs Inst, Norwich House,Level 3,55 King William St, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
[2] Australian Patient Safety Fdn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Ctr Populat Hlth Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Radiol Events Register, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Swinburne Univ Technol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] SA Hlth, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Australia; checklist; interventional radiology; patient safety; PATIENT SAFETY; IMPLEMENTATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1754-9485.12633
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe use of safety checklists in interventional radiology is an intervention aimed at reducing mortality and morbidity. Currently there is little known about their practical use in Australian radiology departments. The primary aim of this mixed methods study was to evaluate how safety checklists (SC) are used and completed in radiology departments within Australian hospitals, and attitudes towards their use as described by Australian radiologists. MethodsA mixed methods approach employing both quantitative and qualitative techniques was used for this study. Direct observations of checklist use during radiological procedures were performed to determine compliance. Medical records were also audited to investigate whether there was any discrepancy between practice (actual care measured by direct observation) and documentation (documented care measured by an audit of records). A focus group with Australian radiologists was conducted to determine attitudes towards the use of checklists. ResultsAmong the four participating radiology departments, overall observed mean completion of the components of the checklist was 38%. The checklist items most commonly observed to be addressed by the operating theatre staff as noted during observations were correct patient (80%) and procedure (60%). Findings from the direct observations conflicted with the medical record audit, where there was a higher percentage of completion (64% completion) in comparison to the 38% observed. The focus group participants spoke of barriers to the use of checklists, including the culture of radiology departments. ConclusionThis is the first study of safety checklist use in radiology within Australia. Overall completion was low across the sites included in this study. Compliance data collected from observations differed markedly from reported compliance in medical records. There remain significant barriers to the proper use of safety checklists in Australian radiology departments.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GUIDE TURFGR RAT
[2]   Patient Safety in Interventional Radiological Procedures: Safety Checklists and Protocols [J].
Athreya, Sriharsha ;
Mikhail, Mike ;
Welsh, Sandra Reis ;
Muzzafar, Ahmed ;
Martin, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2013, 9 (03) :119-121
[3]   A qualitative study comparing experiences of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals in high-income and low-income countries [J].
Aveling, Emma-Louise ;
McCulloch, Peter ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (08)
[4]   A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Compliance, and Critical Factors for Implementation of Safety Checklists in Surgery [J].
Borchard, Annegret ;
Schwappach, David L. B. ;
Barbir, Aline ;
Bezzola, Paula .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (06) :925-933
[5]   Effective Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation [J].
Conley, Dante M. ;
Singer, Sara J. ;
Edmondson, Lizabeth ;
Berry, William R. ;
Gawande, Atul A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2011, 212 (05) :873-879
[6]   Use of "Time-Out" checklist in interventional radiology procedures as a tool to enhance patient safety [J].
Corso, Rocco ;
Vacirca, Francesco ;
Patelli, Chiara ;
Leni, Davide .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (11) :828-834
[7]   Effect of a Comprehensive Surgical Safety System on Patient Outcomes. [J].
de Vries, Eefje N. ;
Prins, Hubert A. ;
Crolla, Rogier M. P. H. ;
den Outer, Adriaan J. ;
van Andel, George ;
van Helden, Sven H. ;
Schlack, Wolfgang S. ;
van Putten, M. Agnes ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W. ;
Smorenburg, Susanne M. ;
Boermeester, Marja A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (20) :1928-1937
[8]   Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units:: The Hawthorne effect [J].
Eckmanns, Tim ;
Bessert, Jan ;
Behnke, Michael ;
Gastmeier, Petra ;
Rueden, Henning .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (09) :931-934
[9]  
Gawande Atul, 2010, Checklist Manifesto
[10]   Use of surgical safety checklists in Australian operating theatres: an observational study [J].
Giles, Kristy ;
Munn, Zachary ;
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Deakin, Anita ;
Schultz, Timothy ;
Mandel, Catherine ;
Maddern, Guy ;
Pearson, Alan ;
Runciman, William .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (12) :971-975