Initial stability measurement of dental implants placed in different anatomical regions of fresh human cadaver jawbone

被引:31
作者
Seong, Wook-Jin [1 ]
Holte, James E. [2 ]
Holtan, James R. [1 ]
Olin, Paul S. [1 ]
Hodges, James S. [3 ]
Ko, Ching-Chang [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Sci, Div Prosthodont, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Inst Technol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthodont, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60103-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Initial implant stability has been used as an indicator for future osseointegration and whether immediate/early loading protocol should be applied. However, differences in initial stability in relation to anatomical regions of jawbone have not been studied extensively because of the risks involved with stability measurements. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether initial implant stability varies with anatomical regions jaw one. Material and methods. Four pairs of edentulous maxillae and mandibles were retrieved from fresh human cadavers. Six implants (Biomet 3i) per pair were placed in different anatomical regions (maxillary anterior, right and left maxillary posterior, mandibular anterior, right and left mandibular posterior). Immediately after Implant placement, initial implant stability was measured with a custom-made resonance frequency analyzer, a commercial resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell), and a mechanical tapping device (Periotest). All implant surgeries and initial stability measurements were performed within 72 hours of death to simulate a clinical setting. Repeated measures ANOVA (alpha=.05) and univariate correlation analyses were used to analyze the data. Results. Mandibular implants had significantly higher initial stability than maxillary implants. Posterior maxillary implants were least stable. Stability was less buccolingually than mesiodistally. The measurements from 3 stability measuring devices were strongly associated with each other. Conclusions. Initial implant stability varied among anatomical regions of jawbone. Rank of Periotest value and implant stability quotient (Osstell) had the highest correlation (r=-0.852).
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 434
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model [J].
Al-Nawas, B. ;
Groetz, K. A. ;
Goetz, H. ;
Duschner, H. ;
Wagner, W. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (01) :1-8
[2]  
Aparicio C, 1997, INT J PERIODONT REST, V17, P151
[3]  
Balleri Piero, 2002, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V4, P128, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00162.x
[4]  
Balshi SF, 2005, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V20, P584
[5]   Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. A clinical resonance-frequency analysis study with sandblasted-and-etched ITI implants [J].
Bischof, M ;
Nedir, R ;
Szmukler-Moncler, S ;
Bernard, JP ;
Samson, J .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (05) :529-539
[6]  
BRUNSKI J B, 1992, Clinical Materials, V10, P153, DOI 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-Y
[7]   INFLUENCE OF FUNCTIONAL USE OF ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANTS ON THE TISSUE-IMPLANT INTERFACE .1. HISTOLOGICAL ASPECTS [J].
BRUNSKI, JB ;
MOCCIA, AF ;
POLLACK, SR ;
KOROSTOFF, E ;
TRACHTENBERG, DI .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1979, 58 (10) :1953-1969
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF ORAL IMPLANT MOBILITY [J].
CHAVEZ, H ;
ORTMAN, LF ;
DEFRANCO, RL ;
MEDIGE, J .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1993, 70 (05) :421-426
[9]  
Glauser R, 2001, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V3, P204
[10]   Relevance of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate dental implant stability: simulation and histomorphometrical animal experiments [J].
Ito, Yoshihiro ;
Sato, Daisuke ;
Yoneda, Satoshi ;
Ito, Daisuke ;
Kondo, Hisatomo ;
Kasugai, Shohei .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (01) :9-14