How the COVID-19 pandemic divides society: Towards a better understanding of differences between supporters and opponents of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Germany

被引:2
作者
Jung, Stefanie [1 ]
Krueger, Tillmann H. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Psychiat Social Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Div Clin Psychol & Sexual Med, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Ctr Syst Neurosci, Hannover, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Lockdown; Mental health; Corona lockdown opponents; ANXIETY; CONCLUSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Implemented COVID-19 containment measures have been fiercely discussed in Germany and corona-related protests have emerged. We assessed mental health in response to the lockdown in Germany and aimed at detecting factors differentiating opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 containment measures. Using a crosssectional online survey (n = 1219) with a mixed-methods approach, we found increased levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4 and GAD-7), overall lower well-being (WHO-5), worsened sleep, increased prevalence of interpersonal violence (5.2%) as well as more pronounced irritability including anger and aggression compared to pre-COVID-19 times for all participants. Moreover, opponents demonstrated a more pronounced mental burden with more depression and anxiety, more anger and coping difficulties compared to supporters. In line with previous research, we found opponents to be well-educated, financially stable and strongly estranged by their political institutions. Additionally, applying regression analysis, we found anxiety and negative selfconcept to differentiate between opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Qualitative data confirms an increase in mental burden. Taken together, we identify a more vulnerable group opposing COVID-19 containment measures. Our results inform the public about opponents' motives, concerns and needs and open another perspective on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related containment measures.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 240
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[31]   Under what circumstances do patients with schizophrenia jump to conclusions? A liberal acceptance account [J].
Moritz, Steffen ;
Woodward, Todd S. ;
Lambert, Martin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 46 :127-137
[32]  
Nachtwey Oliver, 2020, Politische Soziologie der Corona-Proteste
[33]   Use of the extreme groups approach: A critical reexamination and new recommendations [J].
Preacher, KJ ;
Rucker, DD ;
MacCallum, RC ;
Nicewander, WA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 10 (02) :178-192
[34]  
Rammstedt B., 2014, Big Five Inventory (BFI-10)
[35]  
Teasdale J.D., 1995, AFFECT COGNITION CHA
[36]   The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Topp, Christian Winther ;
Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen ;
Sondergaard, Susan ;
Bech, Per .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2015, 84 (03) :167-176