How the COVID-19 pandemic divides society: Towards a better understanding of differences between supporters and opponents of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Germany

被引:2
作者
Jung, Stefanie [1 ]
Krueger, Tillmann H. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Psychiat Social Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Div Clin Psychol & Sexual Med, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Ctr Syst Neurosci, Hannover, Germany
关键词
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Lockdown; Mental health; Corona lockdown opponents; ANXIETY; CONCLUSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.001
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Implemented COVID-19 containment measures have been fiercely discussed in Germany and corona-related protests have emerged. We assessed mental health in response to the lockdown in Germany and aimed at detecting factors differentiating opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 containment measures. Using a crosssectional online survey (n = 1219) with a mixed-methods approach, we found increased levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms (PHQ-4 and GAD-7), overall lower well-being (WHO-5), worsened sleep, increased prevalence of interpersonal violence (5.2%) as well as more pronounced irritability including anger and aggression compared to pre-COVID-19 times for all participants. Moreover, opponents demonstrated a more pronounced mental burden with more depression and anxiety, more anger and coping difficulties compared to supporters. In line with previous research, we found opponents to be well-educated, financially stable and strongly estranged by their political institutions. Additionally, applying regression analysis, we found anxiety and negative selfconcept to differentiate between opponents and supporters of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Qualitative data confirms an increase in mental burden. Taken together, we identify a more vulnerable group opposing COVID-19 containment measures. Our results inform the public about opponents' motives, concerns and needs and open another perspective on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related containment measures.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 240
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 2007, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470114754
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the DepCare project
[3]  
BECK A T, 1976, P356
[4]   Practice Statistics Notes Analysis of continuous data from small samples [J].
Bland, J. Martin ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF DYSFUNCTIONAL ATTITUDES AS VULNERABILITIES TO DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS [J].
BROWN, GP ;
HAMMEN, CL ;
CRASKE, MG ;
WICKENS, TD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 104 (03) :431-435
[6]   THE COST OF DICHOTOMIZATION [J].
COHEN, J .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 7 (03) :249-253
[7]  
Delaney H.D., 2003, Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, V3rd ed., DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410609243
[8]   Psychological Aspects and Eating Habits during COVID-19 Home Confinement: Results of EHLC-COVID-19 Italian Online Survey [J].
Di Renzo, Laura ;
Gualtieri, Paola ;
Cinelli, Giulia ;
Bigioni, Giulia ;
Soldati, Laura ;
Attina, Alda ;
Bianco, Francesca Fabiola ;
Caparello, Giovanna ;
Camodeca, Vanessa ;
Carrano, Elena ;
Ferraro, Simona ;
Giannattasio, Silvia ;
Leggeri, Claudia ;
Rampello, Tiziana ;
Lo Presti, Laura ;
Tarsitano, Maria Grazia ;
De Lorenzo, Antonino .
NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (07) :1-14
[9]   The Longitudinal Links of Personality Traits, Values, and Well-Being and Self-Esteem: A Five-Wave Study of a Nationally Representative Sample [J].
Fetvadjiev, Velichko H. ;
He, Jia .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 117 (02) :448-464
[10]   The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples [J].
Fowler, David ;
Freeman, Daniel ;
Smith, Ben ;
Kuipers, Elizabeth ;
Bebbington, Paul ;
Bashforth, Hannah ;
Coker, Sian ;
Hodgekins, Joanne ;
Gracie, Alison ;
Dunn, Graham ;
Garety, Philippa .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (06) :749-759