Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects

被引:20
作者
Wu, Jie [1 ]
Xu, Guangcheng [1 ]
Zhu, Qingyuan [2 ]
Zhang, Chaochao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Res Ctr Soft Energy Sci, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2021年 / 105卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fairness concern; Data envelopment analysis; Two-stage system; Utility analysis; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; SUPPLY CHAIN; EFFICIENCY DECOMPOSITION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; BANK PERFORMANCE; COMPANIES; INEQUITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2021.102521
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In a two-stage series system with two sub-stages connected, fairness concern between two sub-stages is critical. In order to evaluate system performance fairly and objectively, data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been widely applied for evaluating multi-input and multi-output two-stage series systems. Traditional two-stage evaluation DEA models ignore the behavioral factors between two sub-stages. This paper studies how one behavioral factor, fairness concern, impacts decision making unit (DMU) by proposing new utility-based two-stage DEA models to analyse the non-cooperative and cooperative modes. Two simple algorithms are proposed to solve our nonlinear models and one simple algorithm is proposed to determine the parameters of fairness concern. Further, theorems are proposed to better understand the impacts of fairness concern on DMUs. Finally, a numerical example and an application of fairness concern between sub-stages in non-life insurance companies are given to illustrate the proposed approach and to compare it in different scenarios, respectively. The results from two examples show that acknowledging fairness concern in two-stage system is imperative to achieve its best performance. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]   Reactions to perceived inequity in US and Dutch interorganizational relationships [J].
Scheer, LK ;
Kumar, N ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 46 (03) :303-316
[42]   Two-stage DEA: An application to Major League Baseball [J].
Sexton, TR ;
Lewis, HF .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2003, 19 (2-3) :227-249
[43]   BANK BRANCH OPERATING EFFICIENCY - EVALUATION WITH DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
SHERMAN, HD ;
GOLD, F .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1985, 9 (02) :297-315
[44]   Performance evaluation of heterogeneous bank supply chain systems from the perspective of measurement and decomposition [J].
Sun, Jiasen ;
Wang, Chun ;
Ji, Xiang ;
Wu, Jie .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 113 :891-903
[45]   Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA [J].
Wang, Ke ;
Huang, Wei ;
Wu, Jie ;
Liu, Ying-Nan .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 :5-20
[46]   A comprehensive analysis of China's regional energy saving and emission reduction efficiency: From production and treatment perspectives [J].
Wu, Jie ;
Lv, Lin ;
Sun, Jiasen ;
Ji, Xiang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 84 :166-176
[47]   Assessing the efficiency of financial supply chain for Chinese commercial banks: a two-stage AR-DEA model [J].
Xu, Guangcheng ;
Zhou, Zhixiang .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2021, 121 (04) :894-920
[48]   A DEA-based two-stage network approach for hotel performance analysis: An internal cooperation perspective [J].
Yin, Pengzhen ;
Chu, Junfei ;
Wu, Jie ;
Ding, Jingjing ;
Yang, Min ;
Wang, Yuhong .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 93
[49]   Innovation performance evaluation for high-tech companies using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach [J].
Yu, Anyu ;
Shi, Yu ;
You, Jianxin ;
Zhu, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 292 (01) :199-212
[50]   Utility-based two-stage models with fairness concern [J].
Zha, Yong ;
Wang, Jun ;
Liang, Nannan ;
Zhou, Chuiri .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 24 (04) :877-900