Understanding Impacts of Service Robots with the Revised Gap Model

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Shengliang [1 ]
Huang, Chaoying [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [2 ,3 ]
Ren, Ai [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Polytech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] SUNY Coll New Paltz, Sch Business, New Paltz, NY 12561 USA
关键词
service robot; gap model; service quality; service delivery; robot manufacturer; EXPERIENCE; HOSPITALITY; TOURISM; INTELLIGENCE; EMPLOYEES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/su14052692
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The service quality gap model, which identifies the antecedents of SERVQAUL, reveals that service quality depends on the gap between customer perceived and expected service (Gap 5), which can be caused by other gaps in the service process (Gaps 1-4). The emergence of service robots has affected the quality of services provided; however, little is known about how these impacts happen. Thus, this paper aims to explore the impacts of service robots on service quality by revising the original gap model in the context of robot service. This paper reviews and analyzes the literature related to service robots and develops a revised gap model for robot service by integrating the existing research on the impacts of service robots. By introducing the roles of robots and robot manufacturers into the original gap model, the revised gap model adds three new gaps: Gap 6 (manufacturers' understanding gap), Gap 7 (technical gap), and Gap 8 (service coordination gap). Based on the revised gap model, the impacts of service robots on service quality are expounded (i.e., Gap 5 can be affected by not only Gaps 1-4 but also Gaps 6-8), and several propositions are introduced. This paper is the first to consider robot manufacturers as part of the service quality gap model, and the first to use a dynamic model to explore the impacts of service robots on service quality. This paper not only supplements the service robot and gap model literature but also provides service companies with a meaningful framework to improve service quality when using robots to provide service.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
aic M., 2019, DESIGNED SERVE SOCIA
[2]   Customer Inconvenience and Price Compensation: A Multiperiod Approach to Labor-Automation Trade-Offs in Services [J].
Andreassen, Tor W. ;
van Oest, Rutger D. ;
Lervik-Olsen, Line .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2018, 21 (02) :173-183
[3]  
Barrett M, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P135
[4]   Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work [J].
Barrett, Michael ;
Oborn, Eivor ;
Orlikowski, Wanda J. ;
Yates, JoAnne .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (05) :1448-1466
[5]   Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Kulic, Dana ;
Croft, Elizabeth ;
Zoghbi, Susana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2009, 1 (01) :71-81
[6]  
Beane M, 2019, HARVARD BUS REV, V97, P140
[7]   Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda [J].
Belanche, Daniel ;
Casalo, Luis, V ;
Flavian, Carlos ;
Schepers, Jeroen .
SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2020, 40 (3-4) :203-225
[8]  
BenMark G., 2016, Harvard Business Review, P2
[9]   Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms [J].
Bolton, Ruth N. ;
McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. ;
Cheung, Lilliemay ;
Gallan, Andrew ;
Orsingher, Chiara ;
Witell, Lars ;
Zaki, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 29 (05) :776-808
[10]   Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves [J].
Broadbent, Elizabeth .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :627-652