Flexible proton density (PD) mapping using multi-contrast variable flip angle (VFA) data

被引:11
|
作者
Lorio, Sara [1 ]
Tierney, Tim M. [2 ]
McDowell, Amy [1 ]
Arthurs, Owen J. [1 ,3 ]
Lutti, Antoine [4 ,5 ]
Weiskopf, Nikolaus [6 ]
Carmichael, David W. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, London, England
[2] UCL, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, Inst Neurol, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Sick Children, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurosci, Lab Res Neuroimaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[6] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, Dept Neurophys, Leipzig, Germany
[7] Kings Coll London, Wellcome Ctr Med Engn Biomed Engn, EPSRC, London, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 欧洲研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Quantitative MRI; Proton density; Biophysical tissue properties; Anatomical malformation; Post-mortem MRI; WATER-CONTENT; WHITE-MATTER; HUMAN BRAIN; TRANSMIT FIELD; SPIN-ECHO; MRI; FLASH; IRON; T-1; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.023
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Quantitative proton density (PD) maps measure the amount of free water, which is important for non-invasive tissue characterization in pathology and across lifespan. PD mapping requires the estimation and subsequent removal of factors influencing the signal intensity other than PD. These factors include the T1, T2* relaxation effects, transmit field inhomogeneities, receiver coil sensitivity profile (RP) and the spatially invariant factor that is required to scale the data. While the transmit field can be reliably measured, the RP estimation is usually based on image post-processing techniques due to limitations of its measurement at magnetic fields higher than 1.5 T. The post-processing methods are based on unified bias-field/tissue segmentation, fitting the sensitivity profile from images obtained with different coils, or on the linear relationship between T1 and PD. The scaling factor is derived from the signal within a specific tissue compartment or reference object. However, these approaches for calculating the RP and scaling factor have limitations particularly in severe pathology or over a wide age range, restricting their application. We propose a new approach for PD mapping based on a multi-contrast variable flip angle acquisition protocol and a data-driven estimation method for the RP correction and map scaling. By combining all the multi-contrast data acquired at different echo times, we are able to fully correct the MRI signal for T2* relaxation effects and to decrease the variance and the entropy of PD values within tissue class of the final map. The RP is determined from the corrected data applying a non-parametric bias estimation, and the scaling factor is based on the median intensity of an external calibration object. Finally, we compare the signal intensity and homogeneity of the multi-contrast PD map with the well-established effective PD (PD*) mapping, for which the RP is based on concurrent bias field estimation and tissue classification, and the scaling factor is estimated from the mean white matter signal. The multi-contrast PD values homogeneity and accuracy within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and deep brain structures are increased beyond that obtained using PD* maps. We demonstrate that the multi-contrast RP approach is insensitive to anatomical or a priori tissue information by applying it in a patient with extensive brain abnormalities and for whole body PD mapping in post-mortem foetal imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 475
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] T1 Mapping Using Variable Flip Angle SPGR Data With Flip Angle Correction
    Liberman, Gilad
    Louzoun, Yoram
    Ben Bashat, Dafna
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (01) : 171 - 180
  • [2] A new algebraic method for quantitative proton density mapping using multi-channel coil data
    Cordes, Dietmar
    Yang, Zhengshi
    Zhuang, Xiaowei
    Sreenivasan, Karthik
    Mishra, Virendra
    Hua, Le H.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2017, 40 : 154 - 171
  • [3] Quantitative T1 and proton density mapping with direct calculation of radiofrequency coil transmit and receive profiles from two-point variable flip angle data
    Baudrexel, Simon
    Reitz, Sarah C.
    Hof, Stephanie
    Gracien, Rene-Maxime
    Fleischer, Vinzenz
    Zimmermann, Hilga
    Droby, Amgad
    Klein, Johannes C.
    Deichmann, Ralf
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 29 (03) : 349 - 360
  • [4] Data-Driven multi-Contrast spectral microstructure imaging with InSpect: INtegrated SPECTral component estimation and mapping
    Slator, Paddy J.
    Hutter, Jana
    Marinescu, Razvan V.
    Palombo, Marco
    Jackson, Laurence H.
    Ho, Alison
    Chappell, Lucy C.
    Rutherford, Mary
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 71 (71)
  • [5] Uncertainty in T1 mapping using the variable flip angle method with two flip angles
    Schabel, Matthias C.
    Morrell, Glen R.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (01): : N1 - N8
  • [6] Histological validation of three-dimensional variable flip angle turbo spin echo multi-contrast magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in characterizing carotid vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques
    Liu, Jiachen
    Ning, Zihan
    Du, Chenlin
    Chen, Shuo
    Wang, Tao
    Cao, Jingli
    Huo, Ran
    Li, Dongye
    Yang, Dandan
    Shen, Rui
    Yu, Shuwan
    Hu, Chunjiang
    Wang, Shuhao
    Qiao, Huiyu
    Zhao, Xihai
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2024, 26 (02)
  • [7] Validation of single reference variable flip angle (SR-VFA) dynamic T1 mapping with T2* correction using a novel rotating phantom
    Malmberg, Michael A.
    Odeen, Henrik
    Hofstetter, Lorne W.
    Hadley, J. Rock
    Parker, Dennis L.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 91 (04) : 1419 - 1433
  • [8] Simultaneous multi-parametric mapping of total sodium concentration, T1, T2 and ADC at 7 T using a multi-contrast unbalanced SSFP
    Leroi, Lisa
    Coste, Arthur
    de Rochefort, Ludovic
    Santin, Mathieu D.
    Valabregue, Romain
    Mauconduit, Franck
    Giacomini, Eric
    Luong, Michel
    Chazel, Edouard
    Valette, Julien
    Le Bihan, Denis
    Poupon, Cyril
    Boumezbeur, Fawzi
    Rabrait-Lerman, Cecile
    Vignaud, Alexandre
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 53 : 156 - 163
  • [9] Three-Dimensional GRE T1ρ mapping of the brain using tailored variable flip-angle scheduling
    Johnson, Casey P.
    Thedens, Daniel R.
    Kruger, Stanley J.
    Magnotta, Vincent A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 84 (03) : 1235 - 1249
  • [10] Silent T1 mapping using the variable flip angle method with B1 correction
    Ljungberg, Emil
    Wood, Tobias
    Solana, Ana Beatriz
    Kolind, Shannon
    Williams, Steven C. R.
    Wiesinger, Florian
    Barker, Gareth J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 84 (02) : 813 - 824