Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability

被引:6
作者
Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu [1 ]
Celik, Derya [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
chronic ankle instability; Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; reliability; self-reported outcome measurement; validity; MEASURE FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MEASURE FAAM; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The reliability, and discriminative ability of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire, Japanese version
    Mineta, Shinshiro
    Inami, Takayuki
    Fukano, Mako
    Hoshiba, Takuma
    Masuda, Yuta
    Yoshimura, Akane
    Kumai, Tsukasa
    Hirose, Norikazu
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2019, 35 : 1 - 6
  • [42] Validation of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional observational study
    Antonio Manoel Goulart Neto
    Nicola Maffulli
    Filippo Migliorini
    Fábio Sprada de Menezes
    Rodrigo Okubo
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [43] Danish Language Version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) in Patients with Ankle-Related Fractures
    Erichsen, Julie
    Froberg, Lonnie
    Viberg, Bjarke
    Damborg, Frank
    Jensen, Carsten
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 59 (04) : 657 - 663
  • [44] Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Korean Version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire
    Kim, Ji-Beom
    Kim, Je Kyun
    Seo, Sang Gyo
    Lee, Dong Yeon
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2015, 54 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [45] Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Spanish version of The Foot and Ankle Ability Measures ( FAAM-Sp)
    Cervera-Garvi, Pablo
    Belen Ortega-Avila, Ana
    Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose
    Antonio Cervera-Marin, Jose
    Roy Martin, Rob
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2017, 10
  • [46] Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool for Athletes
    Yazgan, Elif Aleyna
    Coskunsu, Dilber Karagozoglu
    Ozdincler, Arzu Razak
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [47] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS)
    Turhan, Egemen
    Demirel, Murat
    Daylak, Alisan
    Huri, Gazi
    Doral, Mahmut Nedim
    Celik, Derya
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2017, 51 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [48] The Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Turkish Version Study
    Yapali, Gokmen
    Gunel, Mintaze Kerem
    Karahan, Sevilay
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (11) : E678 - E682
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran
    Negahban, Hossein
    Mazaheri, Masood
    Salavati, Mahyar
    Sohani, Soheil Mansour
    Askari, Marjan
    Fanian, Hossein
    Parnianpour, Mohamad
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 29 (05) : 479 - 486
  • [50] The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; translation and validation of the Dutch language version for ankle fractures
    de Boer, A. Siebe
    Tjioe, Roderik J. C.
    Van der Sijde, Fleur
    Meuffels, Duncan E.
    den Hoed, Pieter T.
    Van der Vlies, Cornelis H.
    Tuinebreijer, Wim E.
    Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08):