Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability

被引:6
作者
Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu [1 ]
Celik, Derya [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
chronic ankle instability; Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; reliability; self-reported outcome measurement; validity; MEASURE FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MEASURE FAAM; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability and Factorial Validity of the Turkish Version of the Pain Disability Index in Rheumatic Patients With Chronic Pain
    Ugurlu, Mustafa
    Ugurlu, Gorkem Karakas
    Erten, Sukran
    Ulusoy Kaymak, Semra
    Caykoylu, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 31 (03) : 265 - 271
  • [32] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
    Candeniz, Seyda
    Kocaman, Hikmet
    Celik, Seher Erol
    Bek, Nilguen
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 68
  • [33] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of Turkish version of Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) scale
    Tayfur, Abdulhamit
    Sendil, Ates
    Karakaya, Jale
    Ergun, Nevin
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2020, 54 (03) : 300 - +
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA)
    Repo, Jussi P.
    Tukiainen, Erkki J.
    Roine, Risto P.
    Kautiainen, Hannu
    Lindahl, Jan
    Ilves, Outi
    Jarvenpaa, Salme
    Hakkinen, Arja
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (06) : 474 - 480
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the ankle inversion discrimination apparatus during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability
    Shao, Xuerong
    Kang, Ming
    Luan, Lijiang
    Deng, Fawei
    Adams, Roger
    Wu, Tao
    Han, Jia
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [36] Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders
    Mousavian, Alireza
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Seyed-Hosseinian, Seyed-Hadi
    Shahpari, Omid
    Elahpour, Nafiseh
    Orooji, Arezoo
    Ebrahimzadeh, Mohammad H.
    Moradi, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2019, 7 (03): : 291 - 296
  • [37] Clinical Assessment of Ankle Injury Outcomes: Case Scenario Using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Cosby, Nicole L.
    Hertel, Jay
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2011, 20 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [38] The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
    Rosen, Adam B.
    Johnston, Madison
    Chung, Sunghoon
    Burcal, Christopher J.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (12) : 1738 - 1741
  • [39] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery
    Dariusch Arbab
    Katharina Kuhlmann
    Christoph Schnurr
    Bertil Bouillon
    Christian Lüring
    Dietmar König
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [40] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery
    Arbab, Dariusch
    Kuhlmann, Katharina
    Schnurr, Christoph
    Bouillon, Bertil
    Luering, Christian
    Konig, Dietmar
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18