Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability

被引:6
|
作者
Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu [1 ]
Celik, Derya [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2019年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
chronic ankle instability; Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; reliability; self-reported outcome measurement; validity; MEASURE FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MEASURE FAAM; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS)
    Inge van den Akker-Scheek
    Arnoud Seldentuis
    Inge HF Reininga
    Martin Stevens
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [22] Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders
    Yagci, Gozde
    Erel, Suat
    Okunakol, Vural
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [23] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases
    Martinelli, Nicolo
    Scotto, Gennaro Maria
    Sartorelli, Elena
    Bonifacini, Carlo
    Bianchi, Alberto
    Malerba, Francesco
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (01) : 277 - 284
  • [24] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Community Integration Measure in patients with chronic stroke
    Yaran, Mahmut
    Kent, Ali Erman
    Ilhanli, Ilker
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (15) : 3457 - 3461
  • [25] Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Scale
    Vosoughi, Amir Reza
    Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi
    Dehbarez, Yasaman Safaei
    Kargarshouraki, Zeinab
    Mahdaviazad, Hamideh
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2024, 17 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [26] Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score
    Karatepe, Altinay Goeksel
    Gunaydin, Rezzan
    Kaya, Taciser
    Karlibas, Ugur
    Ozbek, Guelriz
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [27] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Facial Disability Index
    Ozden, Fatih
    Karaman, Ozgur Nadiye
    Tugay, Nazan
    Savas, Ozden
    Sozen, Tevfik
    Ucuncu, Harun
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [28] Indonesian Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure as Functional Tools of Ankle Instability in Special Force Army was Valid and Reliable
    Fitria, A.
    Tamin, T. Z.
    Murdana, I. N.
    Abdullah, M.
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (09) : 6681 - 6685
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders
    Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu, Bahar
    Firat, Neslihan
    Yildiz, Nazim Tolgahan
    Alkan, Afra
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (03) : 476 - +
  • [30] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Turkish version of Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for children with congenital talipes equinovarus
    Hajebrahimi, Farzin
    Tarakci, Devrim
    Arman, Nilay
    Emir, Ahmet
    Bursali, Aysegul
    Tarakci, Ela
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (04) : 439 - 442