Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability

被引:6
|
作者
Kulunkoglu, Bahar Anaforoglu [1 ]
Celik, Derya [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY | 2019年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
chronic ankle instability; Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; reliability; self-reported outcome measurement; validity; MEASURE FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; MEASURE FAAM; TRANSLATION;
D O I
10.1053/j.jfas.2018.07.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a valid, reliable, and widely used self-reported questionnaire for the foot. It has been adapted and validated for a Turkish-speaking population. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence for validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Foot and Ankle Measure (FAAM-T) in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). A total of 316 patients with CAI were enrolled. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Validity was examined using correlations with the Short Form Health Survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2) questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha scores were 0.94 and 0.96 for the the FAAM-T ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and FAAM-T Sports subscales, respectively, indicating high internal consistency. For the second administration, Cronbach's alpha was found to be 0.96 for both subscales of the FAAM-T. The test-retest reliability of the FAAM-T was very high for both subscales with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 and 0.94, respectively (p < .001). The standard error of the mean and minimal detectable change were determined to be 2.5 and 6.7 for the FAAM-T ADL and 6.9 and 18.5 for the FAAM-T Sport. The FAAM-T ADL and Sport subscales were strongly correlated with the SF-36v2 PF (physical functioning; r = 0.51, r = 0.40, respectively; p = .001) and SF-36v2 PCS (physical component scale; r = 0.64, r = 0.55, respectively; p = .001). The weakest associations between the FAAM-T ADL and Sport and the SF-36v2 were noted for the mental health subscale (r = 0.08 and r = 0.03) and the SF-36v2 MCS (mental component scale; r = .05 and r = .006, respectively). This study provides evidence for validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability for the FAAM-T to evaluate patients with CAI. (C) 2018 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 41
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and Reliability of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Turkish Version for Athletes
    Usgu, Serkan
    Usgu, Gunseli
    Uygur, Fatma
    Yakut, Yavuz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2019, 24 (06): : 263 - 269
  • [2] Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Weel, Hanneke
    Zwiers, Ruben
    Azim, Donija
    Sierevelt, Inger N.
    Haverkamp, Daniel
    van Dijk, C. Niek
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (04) : 1348 - 1354
  • [3] Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Hanneke Weel
    Ruben Zwiers
    Donija Azim
    Inger N. Sierevelt
    Daniel Haverkamp
    C. Niek van Dijk
    Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 1348 - 1354
  • [4] Reliability and validity assessment of the Brazilian Version of the foot and ankle ability measure for individuals with Achilles tendinopathy
    de Melo, Daniel Nogueira Barreto
    Pereira, Paloma Almeida
    de Oliveira, Myslenia Pinheiro
    Martin, Robroy L.
    Bezerra, Marcio Almeida
    de Oliveira, Rodrigo Ribeiro
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2025, 42 : 87 - 91
  • [5] Evidence of Validity for the Japanese Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Uematsu, Daisuke
    Suzuki, Hidetomo
    Sasaki, Shogo
    Nagano, Yasuharu
    Shinozuka, Nobuyuki
    Sunagawa, Norihiko
    Fukubayashi, Toru
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2015, 50 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [6] Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
    Celik, Derya
    Malkoc, Melih
    Martin, RobRoy
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 36 (10) : 1469 - 1476
  • [7] Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
    Derya Çelik
    Melih Malkoç
    RobRoy Martin
    Rheumatology International, 2016, 36 : 1469 - 1476
  • [8] Applicability of cutoff scores of Chinese Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure as inclusion criteria for study of chronic ankle instability in Chinese individuals
    Li, Yinuo
    Tsang, Raymond Chi-Chung
    Liu, Dongsen
    Ruan, Bing
    Yu, Yue
    Gao, Qi
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2021, 48 : 116 - 120
  • [9] Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Brazilian version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire
    Moreira, Tarcisio Santos
    Magalhaes, Livia de Castro
    Silva, Rafael Duarte
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    de Resende, Marcos A.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (24-26) : 2479 - 2490
  • [10] Foot and ankle ability measure: Validation of a Spanish version with 29 items in rehabilitation setting
    Membrilla-Mesa, M. D.
    Aranda-Villalobos, P.
    Pozuelo-Calvo, R.
    Cuesta-Vargas, A. I.
    Arroyo-Morales, M.
    REHABILITACION, 2022, 56 (04): : 312 - 319