Generic Atmospheric Correction Model for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Observations

被引:527
作者
Yu, Chen [1 ]
Li, Zhenhong [1 ]
Penna, Nigel T. [1 ]
Crippa, Paola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
WATER-VAPOR CORRECTION; INSAR; GPS; DEFORMATION; SLIP; VALIDATION; INTERPOLATION; SCATTERERS; MITIGATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1029/2017JB015305
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
For mapping Earth surface movements at larger scale and smaller amplitudes, many new synthetic aperture radar instruments (Sentinel-1A/B, Gaofen-3, ALOS-2) have been developed and launched from 2014-2017, and this trend is set to continue with Sentinel-1C/D, Gaofen-3B/C, RADARSAT Constellation planned for launch during 2018-2025. This poses more challenges for correcting interferograms for atmospheric effects since the spatial-temporal variations of tropospheric delay may dominate over large scales and completely mask the actual displacements due to tectonic or volcanic deformation. To overcome this, we have developed a generic interferometric synthetic aperture radar atmospheric correction model whose notable features comprise (i) global coverage, (ii) all-weather, all-time useability, (iii) correction maps available in near real time, and (iv) indicators to assess the correction performance and feasibility. The model integrates operational high-resolution European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data (0.125 degrees grid, 137 vertical levels, and 6-hr interval) and continuous GPS tropospheric delay estimates (every 5 min) using an iterative tropospheric decomposition model. The model's performance was tested using eight globally distributed Sentinel-1 interferograms, encompassing both flat and mountainous topographies, midlatitude and near polar regions, and monsoon and oceanic climate systems, achieving a phase standard deviation and displacement root-mean-square (RMS) of similar to 1 cm against GPS over wide regions (250 by 250 km). Indicators describing the model's performance including (i) GPS network and ECMWF cross RMS, (ii) phase versus estimated atmospheric delay correlations, (iii) ECMWF time differences, and (iv) topography variations were developed to provide quality control for subsequent automatic processing and provide insights of the confidence level with which the generated atmospheric correction maps may be applied.
引用
收藏
页码:9202 / 9222
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ASTER GLOBAL DIGITAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INT
[3]   A MODEL FOR THE TROPOSPHERIC EXCESS PATH-LENGTH OF RADIO-WAVES FROM SURFACE METEOROLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS [J].
BABY, HB ;
GOLE, P ;
LAVERGNAT, J .
RADIO SCIENCE, 1988, 23 (06) :1023-1038
[4]  
Béjar-Pizarro M, 2013, NAT GEOSCI, V6, P462, DOI [10.1038/ngeo1802, 10.1038/NGEO1802]
[5]   A Network Inversion Filter combining GNSS and InSAR for tectonic slip modeling [J].
Bekaert, D. P. S. ;
Segall, P. ;
Wright, T. J. ;
Hooper, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (03) :2069-2086
[6]   Statistical comparison of InSAR tropospheric correction techniques [J].
Bekaert, D. P. S. ;
Walters, R. J. ;
Wright, T. J. ;
Hooper, A. J. ;
Parker, D. J. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 170 :40-47
[7]   A spatially variable power law tropospheric correction technique for InSAR data [J].
Bekaert, D. P. S. ;
Hooper, A. ;
Wright, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2015, 120 (02) :1345-1356
[8]   Carrier phase wind-up in GPS reflectometry [J].
Beyerle, Georg .
GPS SOLUTIONS, 2009, 13 (03) :191-198
[9]   MIDAS robust trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection [J].
Blewitt, Geoffrey ;
Kreemer, Corne ;
Hammond, William C. ;
Gazeaux, Julien .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (03) :2054-2068
[10]   Validation of precipitable water from ECMWF model analyses with GPS and radiosonde data during the MAP SOP [J].
Bock, O ;
Keil, C ;
Richard, E ;
Flamant, C ;
Bouin, MN .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 131 (612) :3013-3036