Mission statements in universities: Readability and performance

被引:16
作者
Cortes, Julian D. [1 ,2 ]
Rivera, Liliana [1 ,3 ]
Carbonelld, Katerina Bohle [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rosario, Sch Business & Management, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Fudan Univ, Fudan Dev Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] MIT, Ctr Transportat & Logist, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Natl Univ Ireland, Whitaker Inst, Galway, Ireland
[5] Ronin Inst, Montclair, NJ USA
关键词
Mission statement; Readability; Performance; Research evaluation; Innovation; HIGHER-EDUCATION; INSTITUTIONS; METAANALYSIS; INNOVATION; WORLDWIDE; INDICATOR; DISCOURSE; DYNAMICS; RANKING; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100183
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The mission statement(s) (MS) is one of the most-used tools for planning and management. Universities worldwide have implemented MS in their knowledge planning and management processes since the 1980s. Research studies have extensively explored the content and readability of MS and its effect on performance in firms, but their effect on public or nonprofit institutions such as universities has not been scrutinized with the same intensity. This study used Gunning's Fog Index score to determine the readability of a sample of worldwide universities' MS and two rankings, i.e., Quacquarelli Symonds World University Ranking and SCImago Institutions Rankings, to determine their effect on performance. No significant readability differences were identified in regions, size, focus, research type, age band, or status. Logistic regression (cumulative link model) results showed that variables, such as universities' age, focus, and size, have more-significant explanatory power on performance than MS readability. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. on behalf of AEDEM.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Altbach P., 2007, Journal of Studies in International Higher Education, V11, P290, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1028315307303542, 10.1177/1028315307303542]
[2]   A critical review on world university ranking in terms of top four ranking systems [J].
Anowar, Farzana ;
Helal, Mustakim A. ;
Afroj, Saida ;
Sultana, Sumaiya ;
Sarker, Farhana ;
Mamun, Khondaker A. .
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 2015, 312 :559-566
[3]   Textual mapping of imitation and intertextuality in college and university mission statements: A new institutional perspective [J].
Atkinson, Timothy N. .
SEMIOTICA, 2008, 172 (1-4) :361-387
[4]   Developing mission statements which work [J].
Baetz, MC ;
Bart, CK .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1996, 29 (04) :526-533
[5]  
Bart Christopher K, 2004, J Health Organ Manag, V18, P92
[6]   Mission statement content and hospital performance in the Canadian not-for-profit health care sector [J].
Bart, CK .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :18-29
[7]   The relationship between mission statements and firm performance: An exploratory study [J].
Bart, CK ;
Baetz, MC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 35 (06) :823-853
[8]   The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
de Moya Anegon, Felix ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (02) :333-335
[9]   Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores [J].
Bowman, Nicholas A. ;
Bastedo, Michael N. .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 61 (04) :431-444
[10]  
Bugaj J. M., 2018, J EC MANAGEMENT, V34, P39, DOI 10.22367/j.joi.2018.34.02