Generalized versus non-generalized neural network model for multi-lead inflow forecasting at Aswan High Dam

被引:26
作者
El-Shafie, A. [1 ]
Noureldin, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Civil & Struct Engn Dept, Bangi, Malaysia
[2] Royal Mil Coll Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
GENETIC ALGORITHM; RIVER;
D O I
10.5194/hess-15-841-2011
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Artificial neural networks (ANN) have been found efficient, particularly in problems where characteristics of the processes are stochastic and difficult to describe using explicit mathematical models. However, time series prediction based on ANN algorithms is fundamentally difficult and faces problems. One of the major shortcomings is the search for the optimal input pattern in order to enhance the forecasting capabilities for the output. The second challenge is the over-fitting problem during the training procedure and this occurs when ANN loses its generalization. In this research, autocorrelation and cross correlation analyses are suggested as a method for searching the optimal input pattern. On the other hand, two generalized methods namely, Regularized Neural Network (RNN) and Ensemble Neural Network (ENN) models are developed to overcome the drawbacks of classical ANN models. Using Generalized Neural Network (GNN) helped avoid over-fitting of training data which was observed as a limitation of classical ANN models. Real inflow data collected over the last 130 years at Lake Nasser was used to train, test and validate the proposed model. Results show that the proposed GNN model outperforms non-generalized neural network and conventional auto-regressive models and it could provide accurate inflow forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 858
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, COMPREHENSIVE FDN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
  • [3] [Anonymous], TOPICS SYSTEM ANAL I
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, Pattern Classification
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1980, APPL MODELING HYDROL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT07809
  • [6] A comparison between neural-network forecasting techniques - Case study: River flow forecasting
    Atiya, AF
    El-Shoura, SM
    Shaheen, SI
    El-Sherif, MS
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 10 (02): : 402 - 409
  • [7] Box G., 1970, Control
  • [8] Bras R.L., 1985, Random functions and hydrology
  • [9] CAUDILL M, 1991, AI EXPERT JAN, P56
  • [10] Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River
    Chau, K. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 329 (3-4) : 363 - 367