Leveling the Field for a Fairer Race between Going and Stopping: Neural Evidence for the Race Model of Motor Inhibition from a New Version of the Stop Signal Task

被引:8
作者
Dykstra, Tobin [1 ]
Waller, Darcy A. [1 ]
Hazeltine, Eliot [1 ]
Wessel, Jan R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
CHOICE REACTION-TIME; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BRAIN; IMPULSIVITY; ATTENTION; STIMULATION; DRINKING; BEHAVIOR; NOVELTY;
D O I
10.1162/jocn_a_01503
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The stop signal task (SST) is the gold standard experimental model of inhibitory control. However, neither SST condition-contrast (stop vs. go, successful vs. failed stop) purely operationalizes inhibition. Because stop trials include a second, infrequent signal, the stop versus go contrast confounds inhibition with attentional and stimulus processing demands. While this confound is controlled for in the successful versus failed stop contrast, the go process is systematically faster on failed stop trials, contaminating the contrast with a different noninhibitory confound. Here, we present an SST variant to address both confounds and evaluate putative neural indices of inhibition with these influences removed. In our variant, stop signals occurred on every trial, equating the noninhibitory demands of the stop versus go contrast. To entice participants to respond despite the impending stop signals, responses produced before stop signals were rewarded. This also reversed the go process bias that typically affects the successful versus failed stop contrast. We recorded scalp electroencephalography in this new version of the task (as well as a standard version of the SST with infrequent stop signal) and found that, even under these conditions, the properties of the frontocentral stop signal P3 ERP remained consistent with the race model. Specifically, in both tasks, the amplitude of the P3 was increased on stop versus go trials. Moreover, the onset of this P3 occurred earlier for successful compared with failed stop trials in both tasks, consistent with the proposal of the race model that an earlier start of the inhibition process will increase stopping success. Therefore, the frontocentral stop signal P3 represents a neural process whose properties are in line with the predictions of the race model of motor inhibition, even when the SST's confounds are controlled.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 602
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Response inhibition deficits in externalizing child psychiatric disorders: An ERP-study with the Stop-task [J].
Albrecht, Bjoern ;
Banaschewski, Tobias ;
Brandeis, Daniel ;
Heinrich, Hartmut ;
Rothenberger, Aribert .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN FUNCTIONS, 2005, 1 (1)
[2]   inhibitrion and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on [J].
Aron, Adam R. ;
Robbins, Trevor W. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (04) :177-185
[3]   Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control [J].
Barcelo, Francisco ;
Escera, Carles ;
Corral, Maria J. ;
Perianez, Jose A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (10) :1734-1748
[4]   The pure electrophysiology of stopping [J].
Bekker, EM ;
Kenemans, JL ;
Hoeksma, MR ;
Talsma, D ;
Verbaten, MN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (02) :191-198
[5]   AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION [J].
BELL, AJ ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) :1129-1159
[6]   Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate [J].
Benjamini, Yoav ;
Krieger, Abba M. ;
Yekutieli, Daniel .
BIOMETRIKA, 2006, 93 (03) :491-507
[7]   Behavioral and cognitive impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder and eating disorders [J].
Boisseau, Christina Lynn ;
Thompson-Brenner, Heather ;
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine ;
Pratt, Elizabeth ;
Farchione, Todd ;
Barlow, David Harrison .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 200 (2-3) :1062-1066
[8]   Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades [J].
Boucher, Leanne ;
Palmeri, Thomas J. ;
Logan, Gordon D. ;
Schall, Jeffrey D. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (02) :376-397
[9]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[10]   MODERN MIND-BRAIN READING - PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COGNITION [J].
COLES, MGH .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 26 (03) :251-269