Respondent reactions to sensitive questions

被引:10
作者
Fendrich, Michael [1 ]
Lippert, Adam M. [1 ]
Johnson, Timothy P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Addict & Behav Hlth Res, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
关键词
respondent reaction; subjective discomfort; warning clauses; informed consent;
D O I
10.1525/jer.2007.2.3.31
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
WE ADMINISTERED DEBRIEFING PROBES TO gauge respondent discomfort in reaction to sensitive questions. These probes assessed respondents' own reactions to being asked to report on substance use (subjective discomfort), as well as their beliefs about the reaction of others (projective discomfort). We investigated whether a sample of men from the general population were more uncomfortable with questions about drug use than a sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) surveyed from the same city (Chicago). We also investigated whether those who disclosed drug use on the survey experienced higher levels of discomfort. Contrary to opinions often expressed as research ethics committee (REC) recommendations, questions about drug use do not generate much subjective discomfort. MSM did not differ from the general population with respect to subjective discomfort. General population males did, however, report higher levels of "drug specific" projective discomfort. Respondents disclosing recent drug use reported higher levels of subjective discomfort. Implications for the REC practice, researcher and REC education, and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Aday L.A., 1996, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, V2nd
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[3]  
Bargh J. A., 2000, HDB RES METHODS SOCI, P253, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996481.017
[4]  
BRADBURN NM, 1978, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, P221
[5]   The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey [J].
Fendrich, M ;
Johnson, TP ;
Wislar, JS ;
Hubbell', A ;
Spiehler, V .
ADDICTION, 2004, 99 (02) :197-208
[6]   The utility of debriefing questions in an household survey on drug abuse [J].
Fendrich, M ;
Wislar, JS ;
Johnson, TP .
JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES, 2003, 33 (02) :267-284
[7]  
Groves R.M., 1998, NONRESPONSE HOUSEHOL, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118490082
[8]  
Groves Robert M., 2002, SURVEY NONRESPONSE
[9]  
Harrison L. D., 2007, DHHS Publication No SMA 07-4249, Methodology Series M-7
[10]  
Lee E.S., 1989, Analyzing Complex Survey Data