Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farms

被引:25
作者
Holly, Michael A. [1 ]
Gunn, Kpoti M. [2 ]
Rotz, C. Alan [2 ]
Kleinman, Peter J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Mech Engn Dept, Green Bay, WI 54311 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, Bldg 3702 Curtin Rd, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2019年 / 35卷 / 03期
关键词
Agricultural Resource Management Survey; ARMS; dairy feeds; nutrient management; animal management; STOCKING RATE; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; COWS;
D O I
10.15232/aas.2018-01833
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Objective: Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. Material and Methods: The USDA's Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy farm strategies and 4 herd size categories. Production strategies were confinement, semi-confinement, organic, management intensive rotational grazing, and Amish (use of draft animals with no use of electricity or mobile, powered equipment). Results and Discussion: Cattle breed and homegrown and purchased feed type and quantity differed significantly among the 5 strategies, whereas housing and manure management varied with herd size. Solid manure handling was used on 41% of farms, consistent with small herd sizes and wide use of tiestall housing (34% of farms). Confinement dairy farms maintained more cows with greater milk production per cow and had more crop area per cow with less reliance on purchased feeds than the weighted average dairy farm. These farms received the lowest net return per unit of milk, which is consistent with a reduction in the number of small confinement farms from the year 2000 to 2010. Although organic dairy producers had 37% greater variable costs, primarily from the high cost of organic feeds, these farms received the greatest return per unit of milk sold through a 51% greater milk price received. Implications and Applications: Management practices found on Pennsylvania dairy farms around the year 2010 are documented to support further assessment of production practices and sustainability of the industry.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 338
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] ASABE, 2014, D3842MAR2005R2014 AS
  • [2] BCMA (British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture), 2015, SIZ DAIR MAN STOR ST
  • [3] A comparison of free-stall barns used by modernized Wisconsin dairies
    Bewley, J
    Palmer, RW
    Jackson-Smith, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2001, 84 (02) : 528 - 541
  • [4] Farm structural change of a different kind: Alternative dairy farms in Wisconsin-graziers, organic and Amish
    Brock, Caroline
    Barham, Bradford
    [J]. RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) : 25 - 37
  • [5] CCOF (California Certified Organic Farmers), 2015, AV DRY MATT PERC DIF
  • [6] Suitability of cross-bred cows for organic farms based on cross-breeding effects on production and functional traits
    de Haas, Y.
    Smolders, E. A. A.
    Hoorneman, J. N.
    Nauta, W. J.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2013, 7 (04) : 655 - 664
  • [7] The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows
    Dillon, P
    Crosse, S
    Stakelum, G
    Flynn, F
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1995, 50 (03) : 286 - 299
  • [8] Dubman R., 2000, AGES0001 USDA EC RES
  • [9] Duiker S. W., 2004, AGRONOMY GUIDE, P1
  • [10] Gillespie J., 2010, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V39, P399