Tongue resting pressure of the tongue anchorage pad in different body positions: a pilot study

被引:2
作者
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Xu, K. [1 ]
Gao, X. [1 ]
Xu, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
tongue; pressure; rest; molar; vertical dimension; supine position; MINI-SCREW IMPLANTS; TRANSPALATAL ARCHES; SKELETAL ANCHORAGE; YOUNG-ADULTS; INTRUSION; TEETH;
D O I
10.1111/joor.12281
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
We designed a modified transpalatal arch (tongue anchorage pad, TAP) to help control the vertical dimension. This study aimed to evaluate its efficiency by measuring the tongue resting pressure at different anteroposterior positions of the TAP in the upright and supine positions and to investigate the effect of changes in body position. Our study recruited 17 volunteers with individual normal occlusion (4 males, 13 females, age 22-33years). An individualised TAP was designed for each subject. With a miniature sensor (FSS1500NS) installed in the device, we measured the pressure at the level of the distal second premolar (PM2), the first molar (M1) and the second molar (M2) in both the upright and supine positions. Nonparametric analysis was applied with the level of significance set at 005. In the upright position, tongue pressures obtained at PM2, M1 and M2 were 18394, 13081 and 11307Pa, respectively, with the maximum value detected at PM2 (P=0001). While in the supine position, pressures of 18703, 15687 and 20169Pa were detected at the same sites, with significantly higher values for M1 (P=0002) and M2 (P=0004). Tongue resting pressure decreases from the anterior aspect to the posterior aspect in the upright position. In the supine position, the pressure is consistent across the midline with pressure enhancement at M1 and M2. As many questions remain about this appliance and appropriate intruding force, further clinical and basic studies are required prior to its clinical implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 419
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF HEAD POSITION ON INTRAORAL PRESSURES IN CLASS-I AND CLASS-II ADULTS [J].
ARCHER, SY ;
VIG, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 87 (04) :311-318
[2]  
BARBRE RE, 1991, ANGLE ORTHOD, V61, P93
[3]   Tongue pressure on loop of transpalatal arch during deglutition [J].
Chiba, Y ;
Motoyoshi, M ;
Namura, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 123 (01) :29-34
[4]  
DeBerardinis M, 2000, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V117, P700
[5]   Lingual Propulsive Pressures Across Consistencies Generated by the Anteromedian and Posteromedian Tongue by Healthy Young Adults [J].
Gingrich, Laura L. ;
Stierwalt, Julie A. G. ;
Hageman, Carlin F. ;
LaPointe, Leonard L. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (03) :960-972
[6]   Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: Is vertical dimension affected? [J].
Gkantidis, Nikolaos ;
Halazonetis, Demetrios J. ;
Alexandropoulos, Evanggelos ;
Haralabakis, Nikos B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (03) :346-355
[7]   Newly developed sensor sheet for measuring tongue pressure during swallowing [J].
Hori, Kazuhiro ;
Ono, Takahiro ;
Tamine, Ken-ichi ;
Kondo, Jugo ;
Hamanaka, Sato ;
Maeda, Yoshinobu ;
Dong, Jian ;
Hatsuda, Masahiro .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2009, 53 (01) :28-32
[8]   Tongue Pressure Patterns During Water Swallowing [J].
Kennedy, Daniel ;
Kieser, Jules ;
Bolter, Chris ;
Swain, Michael ;
Singh, Bhavia ;
Waddell, J. Neil .
DYSPHAGIA, 2010, 25 (01) :11-19
[9]  
KUNVARI B, 1959, DENT ABSTR CHIC, V4, P10
[10]   Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini-screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion [J].
Liu, Y. H. ;
Ding, W. H. ;
Liu, J. ;
Li, Q. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 36 (09) :687-695