Vegetation Management and Host Density Influence Bee-Parasite Interactions in Urban Gardens

被引:17
作者
Cohen, Hamutahl [1 ,2 ]
Quistberg, Robyn D. [1 ]
Philpott, Stacy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Environm Studies, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Environm Studies, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
关键词
Apocephalus borealis; California; urban agriculture; insect-parasite interaction; bee decline; APIS-MELLIFERA; CROP POLLINATION; FLIES DIPTERA; BUMBLE BEES; LAND-USE; HYMENOPTERA; CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE; DECLINE; BOMBUS;
D O I
10.1093/ee/nvx155
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Apocephalus borealis phorid flies, a parasitoid of bumble bees and yellow jacket wasps in North America, was recently reported as a novel parasitoid of the honey bee Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Little is known about the ecology of this interaction, including phorid fecundity on bee hosts, whether phorid-bee parasitism is density dependent, and which local habitat and landscape features may correlate with changes in parasitism rates for either bumble or honey bees. We examined the impact of local and landscape drivers and host abundance on phorid parasitism of A. mellifera and the bumble bee Bombus vosnesenskii Radoszkowski (Hymenoptera: Apidae). We worked in 19 urban gardens along the North-Central Coast of California, where phorid parasitism of honey bees was first reported in 2012. We collected and incubated bees for phorid emergence, and surveyed local vegetation, ground cover, and floral characteristics as well as land cover types surrounding gardens. We found that phorid parasitism was higher on bumble bees than on honey bees, and phorids produced nearly twice as many pupae on individual bumble bee hosts than on honey bee hosts. Parasitism of both bumble and honey bees increased with abundance of honey bees in a site. Differences in landscape surroundings did not correlate with parasitism, but local factors related to bee resource provisioning (e.g., tree and shrub abundance) positively correlated with increased parasitism. This research thus helps to document and describe conditions that may have facilitated phorid fly host shift to honey bees and further elucidate how resource provisioning in urban gardens influences bee-parasite interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:1313 / 1321
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1269239, 10.2307/1269239]
[3]  
Barton K., 2012, CRAN R Project
[4]   Linking anthropogenic resources to wildlife-pathogen dynamics: a review and meta-analysis [J].
Becker, Daniel J. ;
Streicker, Daniel G. ;
Altizer, Sonia .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 18 (05) :483-495
[5]   Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. [J].
Beekman, M ;
Ratnieks, FLW .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) :490-496
[6]   Quantifying exposure of wild bumblebees to mixtures of agrochemicals in agricultural and urban landscapes [J].
Botias, Cristina ;
David, Arthur ;
Hill, Elizabeth M. ;
Goulson, Dave .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 222 :73-82
[7]   Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases [J].
Bradley, Catherine A. ;
Altizer, Sonia .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (02) :95-102
[8]  
Brown Brian V., 1997, Contributions in Science (Los Angeles), V468, P1
[9]   Revision of the subgenus Udamochiras of Melaloncha bee-killing flies (Diptera: Phoridae: Metopininae) [J].
Brown, BV .
ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2004, 140 (01) :1-42
[10]   TAXONOMY AND PRELIMINARY PHYLOGENY OF THE PARASITIC GENUS APOCEPHALUS, SUBGENUS MESOPHORA (DIPTERA, PHORIDAE) [J].
BROWN, BV .
SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1993, 18 (03) :191-230