Telecommunications deregulation and subadditive costs: Are local telephone monopolies unnatural?

被引:9
作者
Wilson, WW [1 ]
Zhou, YM
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Dept Econ, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] Aomori Publ Coll, Dept Management & Econ, Aomori 0300196, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00054-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In early 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Law, providing the foundation for the opening of regulated local telephone monopolies to competition. One important premise for introducing competition into local telephone markets is that these markets are not (or are no longer) natural monopolies. This paper reexamines the natural monopoly issue using a cost function that controls for firm heterogeneity. Our subadditivity tests suggest that Local Exchange Carriers' (LECs) costs are subadditive when there are controls for unobserved heterogeneity, suggesting that local telephone markets are natural monopoly markets. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 930
页数:22
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Berndt E.R., 1993, J. Prod. Anal., V4, P127
[2]  
CAVES DW, 1985, ANAL STUDIES TRANSPO
[3]   A GOAL PROGRAMMING CONSTRAINED REGRESSION REVIEW OF THE BELL SYSTEM BREAKUP [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
SUEYOSHI, T .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (01) :1-26
[4]   THE EFFECT OF PROBABILISTIC DEMANDS ON THE STRUCTURE OF COST-FUNCTIONS [J].
DUNCAN, GM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1990, 3 (03) :211-220
[5]  
EVANS DS, 1984, AM ECON REV, V74, P615
[6]  
EVANS DS, 1983, BREAKING BELL
[7]   ECONOMIES OF SCOPE IN THE LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE MARKET [J].
GABEL, D ;
KENNET, DM .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 1994, 6 (04) :381-398
[8]  
Kennedy P., 2003, GUIDE ECONOMETRICS
[9]  
NADIRI MI, 1981, PRODUCTIVITY MEASURE
[10]   COMPETITION AND ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY - THE CASE OF THE UNITED-STATES TELEPHONE INDUSTRY [J].
OUM, TH ;
ZHANG, YM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1995, 77 (01) :82-96