"I See What You Did There": Understanding People's Social Perception of a Robot and Its Predictability

被引:13
作者
Schadenberg, Bob R. [1 ]
Reidsma, Dennis [1 ]
Heylen, Dirk K. J. [1 ]
Evers, Vanessa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Predictability; responsive actions; human-robot interaction; social perception; UNCERTAINTY; CHILDREN; AUTISM; INTOLERANCE; ANXIETY; BRAIN; INTERVENTION; DIMENSIONS; PREDICTION; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1145/3461534
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Unpredictability in robot behaviour can cause difficulties in interacting with robots. However, for social interactions with robots, a degree of unpredictability in robot behaviour may be desirable for facilitating engagement and increasing the attribution of mental states to the robot. To generate a better conceptual understanding of predictability, we looked at two facets of predictability, namely, the ability to predict robot actions and the association of predictability as an attribute of the robot. We carried out a video human-robot interaction study where we manipulated whether participants could either see the cause of a robot's responsive action or could not see this, because there was no cause, or because we obstructed the visual cues. Our results indicate that when the cause of the robot's responsive actions was not visible, participants rated the robot as more unpredictable and less competent, compared to when it was visible. The relationship between seeing the cause of the responsive actions and the attribution of competence was partially mediated by the attribution of unpredictability to the robot. We argue that the effects of unpredictability may be mitigated when the robot identifies when a person may not be aware of what the robot wants to respond to and uses additional actions to make its response predictable.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 107 条
[71]   Negotiating autonomy and responsibility in military robots [J].
Noorman, Merel ;
Johnson, Deborah G. .
ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 16 (01) :51-62
[72]   A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception [J].
Otten, Marte ;
Seth, Anil K. ;
Pinto, Yair .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2017, 112 :69-77
[73]   Risk, Unexpected Uncertainty, and Estimation Uncertainty: Bayesian Learning in Unstable Settings [J].
Payzan-LeNestour, Elise ;
Bossaerts, Peter .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (01)
[74]   When the world becomes 'too real': a Bayesian explanation of autistic perception [J].
Pellicano, Elizabeth ;
Burr, David .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (10) :504-510
[75]   Human Sensorimotor Communication: A Theory of Signaling in Online Social Interactions [J].
Pezzulo, Giovanni ;
Donnarumma, Francesco ;
Dindo, Haris .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11)
[76]   Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis [J].
Potter, WJ ;
Levine-Donnerstein, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1999, 27 (03) :258-284
[77]   DOES THE CHIMPANZEE HAVE A THEORY OF MIND [J].
PREMACK, D ;
WOODRUFF, G .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1978, 1 (04) :515-526
[78]  
Ragni M, 2016, IEEE ROMAN, P501, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745164
[79]   Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects [J].
Rao, RPN ;
Ballard, DH .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (01) :79-87
[80]   More information from fewer questions: The factor structure and item properties of the original and brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [J].
Rodebaugh, TL ;
Woods, CM ;
Thissen, DM ;
Heimberg, RG ;
Chambless, DL ;
Rapee, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2004, 16 (02) :169-181