Determinations of prostate volume at 3-tesla using an external phased array coil: Comparison to pathologic specimens

被引:54
作者
Sosna, J
Rofsky, NM
Gaston, SM
DeWolf, WC
Lenkinski, RE
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
prostate; volume; magnetic resonance; pathology;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00015-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To compare techniques for measuring in vivo prostate volumes using torso phased-array imaging at 3-Tesla. Methods. Eleven patients imaged at 3-Tesla with a torso-phased array coil using multiplanar fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted imaging who underwent radical prostatectomy comprised the study population. Surgical specimens were imaged. The pathologic specimen volume was compared with varieties of magnetic resonance volume determinations, the latter using ellipsoid and planimetric assessments. Three-dimensional images of the excised prostate were generated. Linear correlation coefficients were calculated comparing volume determinations from image data and pathologic data. Results. Correlation coefficient (r(2)) values from the ellipsoid formula among six different data sets ranging between 0.325 to 0.751; the highest in vivo r(2) value was obtained by multiplying the anterior-posterior and the superior-inferior dimensions from the sagittal image by the right-left dimension from the axial image. The r(2) values of the planimetric volume and specimen 3-dimensional volume rendering were 0.652 and 0.86, respectively. Conclusions. Surface coil prostate imaging at 3-Tesla provides undistorted images for volume assessment and in vivo volume determinations very close to ex vivo imaging volume determinations.
引用
收藏
页码:846 / 853
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Bartha R, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P185, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<185::AID-MRM4>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-V
  • [3] Prostate-specific antigen: Current status
    Brawer, MK
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1999, 49 (05) : 264 - 281
  • [4] Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: Effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging
    Chen, M
    Hricak, H
    Kalbhen, CL
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Vigneron, DB
    Weiss, JM
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (05) : 1157 - 1163
  • [5] Prostate cancer tumor volume: Measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging
    Coakley, FV
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Lu, Y
    Jones, KD
    Swanson, MG
    Chang, SD
    Carroll, PR
    Hricak, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [6] Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy
    Dubois, DF
    Prestidge, BR
    Hotchkiss, LA
    Prete, JJ
    Bice, WS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) : 785 - 789
  • [7] Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Clinical overview and value of diagnostic imaging
    Grossfeld, GD
    Coakley, FV
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (01) : 31 - +
  • [8] Haacke EM, 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I, P378
  • [9] Quantitative MR imaging assessment of prostate gland deformation before and during MR imaging-guided brachytherapy
    Hirose, M
    Bharatha, A
    Hata, N
    Zou, KH
    Warfield, SK
    Cormack, RA
    D'Amico, A
    Kikinis, R
    Jolesz, FA
    Tempany, CMC
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (08) : 906 - 912
  • [10] HRICAK H, 1987, UROL RADIOL, V9, P1