How can Indian power plants cost-effectively meet the new sulfur emission standards? Policy evaluation using marginal abatement cost-curves

被引:16
作者
Sugathan, Anish [1 ]
Bhangale, Ritesh [2 ]
Kansal, Vishal [2 ]
Hulke, Unmil [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Business Policy Area, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
关键词
Power-plant emission standards; SO2 control technologies; Abatement costs; SO2; inventory; Indian electirc-power sector; SHADOW PRICE; POLLUTION; SO2; TECHNOLOGIES; DIOXIDE; IMPACTS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The first-ever SO2 emission concentration standards for Indian coal-power plants were notified on December 7, 2015. In light of the new stringent standards, this paper conducts a techno-economic policy evaluation of SO2 abatement options by building a system-wide marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) for India. An abatement cost model is developed, to estimate retrofit costs for three end-of-process (EOP) SO2 abatement technologies. A system-wide SO2 MACC is derived based on cost optimal allocation of EOP abatement technology to each boiler. Compliance with the new stricter emission standards is evaluated at 75% pollution reduction ( approximate to 4600 kt-SO2 reductions per year). Compliance with the new standard corresponds to a marginal abatement cost of INR 23,500 per ton of SO2 ( approximate to USD 368.50 per ton of SO2) and total system-wide abatement cost of INR 75 billion ( approximate to USD 1.2 billion) per year. Reduction in pollution is estimated to save 46,000 lives per year at the cost of about INR 1.63 million per life per year. Sensitivity analysis of the MAC curve shows that plant capacity utilization has the most significant impact on total lifetime compliance costs followed by equipment fixed cost, sorbent cost, and water cost in that order.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 137
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HLTH EFFECTS COAL EL, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2093610
[2]   Air pollution abatement costs under the Clean Air Act: evidence from the PACE survey [J].
Becker, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) :144-169
[3]  
Bhati P., 2016, TECH REP
[4]   The value of mortality risk reductions in Delhi, India [J].
Bhattacharya, Soma ;
Alberini, Anna ;
Cropper, Maureen L. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2007, 34 (01) :21-47
[5]  
CEA, 2012, TECH REP
[6]  
Central Electricity Authority (CEA), 2021, All India installed capacity (in mw) of power stations
[7]   Measurement of CO2, CO, SO2, and NO emissions from coal-based thermal power plants in India [J].
Chakraborty, N. ;
Mukheriee, I. ;
Santra, A. K. ;
Chowdhury, S. ;
Chakraborty, S. ;
Bhattacharya, S. ;
Mitra, A. P. ;
Sharma, C. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (06) :1073-1082
[8]  
Chanda P, 2016, ENER SYST ELECTR ENG, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-2722-9_1
[9]   The price of pollution: A dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances [J].
Coggins, JS ;
Swinton, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :58-72
[10]  
DePriest W., 2003, P 4 MEG S POW PLANT