Dual spinal cord stimulation for complex pain:: Preliminary study

被引:12
|
作者
Abejón, D
Reig, E
del Pozo, C
Contreras, R
Insausti, J
机构
[1] Fdn Hosp Alcorcon, Unidad Dolor, Area Anestesia & Culdados Crit, Area Anestesia,Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Madrid 28992, Spain
[2] Clin Dolor Madrid, Madrid, Spain
[3] Clin Puerta de Hierro, Clin Unidad Dolor, Madrid, Spain
[4] Hosp Severo Ochoa, Unidad Dolor, Madrid, Spain
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2005年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
chronic complex pain; dual lead; spinal cord stimulation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1403.2005.00226.x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives To retrospectively analyze by indices of success, patients with chronic complex pain, including, axial low back pain, receiving dual spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems. Methods Eighteen patients with dual spinal cord stimulators have been retrospectively and nonrandomly analyzed. The preponderance of patients in our study group had failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Parameters of success of our therapy included reduction of medication, if any, complications, if any, and satisfaction with therapy and improvement in the quality of life, measured by a visual analogical scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Patients were asked to rate their overall experience with their SCS systems and were divided into four separate groupings according to their overall rating of their therapy. These four groupings included therapy ratings of excellent (70-100%), good (> 50%), fair (< 50%), and poor (< 30%). Satisfaction with therapy and improvement in quality of life were evaluated on a five-point scale. Patients were asked to rate changes in their quality of life after therapy using the following normative scale: much better, better, no change, worse, and much worse. All the patients in our study were asked if they would repeat their therapy with dual spinal cord stimulation. Results Paresthesia coverage, overlapping the reported painful region, was obtained in 80% of the patients in our study. The VAS decreased an average of 5.6 (range 2-10) after 6 months and 4.9 (range 2-8) at the end of the study. Six patients (37.5%) reported excellent results; four patients (25%) reported good; three (18.7%), fair and poor. Seventy percent of the patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported an increase in their quality of life. Medications were reduced in 75% of the patients. Thirteen (81%) patients with dual lead SCS therapy were willing to repeat the SCS implant procedure. Complications occurred in 43.7%. Conclusions Dual spinal cord stimulation is appropriate and efficacious for treating complex pathology and complex pain that including pain of the low, axial back.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 111
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Four year follow-up of dual electrode spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain
    Aló, KM
    Redko, V
    Charnov, J
    NEUROMODULATION, 2002, 5 (02): : 79 - 88
  • [42] Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
    van Heteren, Esther P. Z.
    van Roosendaal, Bert -Kristian W. P.
    van Gorp, Eric -Jan J. A. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Buerger, Katja
    Teernstra, Otto P. M.
    Buschman, Hendrik P. J.
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 26 (03): : 658 - 665
  • [43] Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
    van Heteren, Esther P. Z.
    van Roosendaal, Bert-Kristian W. P.
    van Gorp, Eric-Jan J. A. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Burger, Katja
    Teernstra, Otto P. M.
    Buschman, Hendrik P. J.
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (03): : 658 - 665
  • [44] Retrograde thoracic spinal cord stimulation paddle placement for complex persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2
    de Monaco, Bernardo Assumpcao
    Piedade, Guilherme Santos
    Doomi, Ahmed
    Jagid, Jonathan R.
    Almeida, Timoteo
    Cordeiro, Joacir Graciolli
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (03) : 483 - 488
  • [45] Cost-Effectiveness of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation or Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
    Ramchandani, Avinash
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (04): : 718 - 718
  • [46] Successful Treatment of the Pain Associated With Melorheostosis With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Case Study
    Zaveri, Minesh
    Keiser, Melanie D. Goodman
    NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 (03): : 286 - 288
  • [47] Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current perspectives
    Wolter, Tilman
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2014, 7 : 651 - 663
  • [48] Back Pain: A Real Target for Spinal Cord Stimulation?
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Delmotte, Alexandre
    D'Houtaud, Samuel
    Misbert, Lorraine
    Diallo, Bakari
    Roy-Moreau, Aline
    Durand, Sylvain
    Royoux, Solene
    Giot, Jean-Philippe
    Bataille, Benoit
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 70 (03) : 574 - 585
  • [49] Spinal cord stimulation therapy for localized central pain
    Hirato, Masafumi
    Takahashi, Akio
    Watanabe, Katsushige
    Kazama, Ken
    Yoshimoto, Yuhei
    PAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [50] Electroencephalographic evoked pain response is suppressed by spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome: a case report
    Hylands-White, Nicholas
    Duarte, Rui V.
    Beeson, Paul
    Mayhew, Stephen D.
    Raphael, Jon H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2016, 30 (06) : 845 - 848