Attentional blink in preverbal infants

被引:7
|
作者
Tsurumi, Shuma [1 ,2 ]
Kanazawa, So [3 ]
Yamaguchi, Masami K. [1 ]
Kawahara, Jun-ichiro [4 ]
机构
[1] Chuo Univ, Dept Psychol, 742-1 Higashi Nakano, Hachioji, Tokyo 1920393, Japan
[2] Japan Soc Promot Sci, Chiyoda Ku, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Tokyo 1020083, Japan
[3] Japan Womens Univ, Dept Psychol, Bunkyo Ku, 2-8-1 Mejirodai, Tokyo 1128681, Japan
[4] Hokkaido Univ, Dept Psychol, Kita Ku, N10 W7, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600810, Japan
关键词
Attentional blink; Infants; Development; Rapid serial visual presentation; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; CONCEPTUAL INTERFERENCE; DEVELOPMENTAL-CHANGES; RECOGNITION-MEMORY; IDENTIFICATION; EXPECTATIONS; MASKING; TARGET; TASK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104749
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Primary cognitive processes, such as spatial attention, are essential to our higher cognitive abilities and develop dramatically in the first year of life. The spatial aspect of infants' working memory is equivalent to that of adults. However, it is unclear whether this is true for the temporal domain. Thus, we investigated the temporal aspect of infants' working memory using an attentionally demanding task by focusing on the attentional blink effect, in which the identification of the second of the two brief targets is impaired when inter-target lags are short. We argue that finding a similar pattern of the attentional blink in preverbal infants and adults indicates that infants can complete the consolidation of the first target into working memory at a similar temporal scale as adults. In this experiment, we presented 7- to 8-month-old infants with rapid serial visual streams at a rate of 100 ms/item, including two female faces as targets, and examined whether they could identify the targets by measuring their preference to novel faces compared to targets. The temporal separation between the two targets was 200 or 800 ms. We found that the infants could identify both targets under the longer lag, but they failed to identify the second target under the shorter lag. The adult experiment using the same temporal separation as in the infant experiment revealed the attentional blink effect. These results suggest that 7- to 8-month-old infants can consolidate two items into working memory by 800 ms but not by 200 ms.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Attentional blink in infants under 7 months
    Lee, Suetping
    Tsurumi, Shuma
    Kanazawa, So
    Yamaguchi, Masami K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 242
  • [2] Unmasking the Attentional Blink
    Nieuwenstein, Mark R.
    Potter, Mary C.
    Theeuwes, Jan
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (01) : 159 - 169
  • [3] Distraction and the auditory attentional blink
    Horvath, Janos
    Burgyan, Annamaria
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (03) : 695 - 701
  • [4] Categorical similarity modulates temporal integration in the attentional blink
    Zhou, Liqin
    Ding, Jiahui
    Zhou, Ke
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2020, 20 (04):
  • [5] Memory reloaded: Memory load effects in the attentional blink
    Visser, Troy A. W.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06) : 1085 - 1103
  • [6] Eye Movements Blink the Attentional Blink
    Kamienkowski, Juan E.
    Navajas, Joaquin
    Sigman, Mariano
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2012, 38 (03) : 555 - 560
  • [7] Attentional capture triggers an attentional blink
    William S. Maki
    Michael W. Mebane
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2006, 13 : 125 - 131
  • [8] On the role of intervening distractors in the attentional blink
    Brisson, Benoit
    Spalek, Thomas M.
    Di Lollo, Vincent
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (01) : 42 - 52
  • [9] The Role of Spatial Switching in the Attentional Blink
    Berthet, Vincent
    Kouider, Sid
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 15 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [10] The attentional blink is attenuated for objects of expertise
    Blacker, Kara J.
    Curby, Kim M.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2016, 24 (02) : 132 - 140