Characterization of droplet impact and deposit formation on leaf surfaces

被引:59
作者
Dong, Xiang [1 ]
Zhu, Heping [2 ]
Yang, Xuejun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Mechanizat Sci, State Key Lab Soil Plant Machinery Syst Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, USDA ARS, ATRU, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
关键词
droplet rebound; retention; pesticide spray; adjuvant; high-speed image; SPRAY RETENTION; EVAPORATION; SYSTEM; ADHESION; LEAVES; AREA;
D O I
10.1002/ps.3806
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDElucidation of droplet dynamic impact and deposit formation on leaf surfaces would assist in modifying application strategies potentially to improve biological control efficiency and minimize pesticide waste. RESULTSThe mechanics of the three-dimensional droplet impact and formation process on hydrophilic and hydrophobic leaf surfaces was investigated with a system that independently controlled droplet diameter, impact speed and impact angle. Spray solutions were made with a nonionic surfactant in distilled water. Water-only droplets rebounded or splashed on hydrophobic leaves of Euphorbia pulcherrima and Zea mays, but not on hydrophilic Dracaena deremensis leaves. Droplet spread areas on D. deremensis at 5.0 m s(-1) impact speed increased 1.9-fold when the droplet diameter was increased from 175 to 481 mu m. Similarly, spread areas of 306 mu m water-only droplets increased 2.0-fold when the impact speed was increased from 3.5 to 7.0 m s(-1). At surfactant concentrations of 0, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75% (v/v), percentages of droplets that either splashed or bounced off Z. mays were 56, 37, 2 and 0% respectively. CONCLUSIONMicroscopic measurements of droplet impact clarified the effectiveness of surfactants in enhancing droplet retention on hydrophobic leaves and also revealed that water droplets did not rebound or splash on hydrophilic leaves. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 308
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Spray application plays a determining role in performance of systemic compounds applied to the foliage of fruit plants
    Bukovac, MJ
    Cooper, JA
    Whitmoyer, RE
    Brazee, RD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOLIAR NUTRITION OF PERENNIAL FRUIT PLANTS, 2002, (594): : 65 - 75
  • [2] Dong X, 2013, T ASABE, V56, P1641
  • [3] Forster WA, 2005, T ASAE, V48, P1321, DOI 10.13031/2013.19179
  • [4] Fox R. D., 1992, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, V8, P153
  • [5] Gednalske JV, 1993, US Patent, Patent No. [5,260,260, 5260260]
  • [6] Dispersion and evaporation of droplets amended with adjuvants on soybeans
    Gimenes, M. J.
    Zhu, H.
    Raetano, C. G.
    Oliveira, R. B.
    [J]. CROP PROTECTION, 2013, 44 : 84 - 90
  • [7] Spray retention, foliar uptake and translocation of glufosinate and glyphosate in Ambrosia artemisiifolia
    Grangeot, M
    Chauvel, B
    Gauvrit, C
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (02) : 152 - 162
  • [8] Heinrichs F. L., 2002, AGR ADJUVANTS CURREN
  • [9] Johnstone D., 1973, Pesticide Formulations, P343
  • [10] Fractal characterisation of plant canopies and application in spray retention modelling for arable crops and weeds
    Pathan, A. K.
    Kimberley, M. O.
    Forster, W. A.
    Haslett, M. R.
    Steele, K. D.
    [J]. WEED RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (04) : 346 - 353