Sonographic prediction of small and large for gestational age in breech-presenting fetuses

被引:3
作者
Shmueli, Anat [2 ,3 ]
Aviram, Amir [2 ,3 ]
Bardin, Ron [2 ,3 ]
Tenenbaum-Gavish, Kinneret [2 ,3 ]
Wiznitzer, Arnon [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Rony [2 ,3 ]
Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat [1 ]
机构
[1] Helen Schneider Hosp Women, Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Helen Schneider Hosp Women, Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Ramat Aviv, Israel
关键词
Estimated fetal weight; fetal biometry; fetal presentation; growth formulas; FETAL WEIGHT-ESTIMATION; BIRTH-WEIGHT; FEMUR LENGTH; HEAD; ACCURACY; DELIVERY; CHARTS; SIZE; TRIAL; TERM;
D O I
10.1515/jpm-2016-0323
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: To evaluate various sonographic estimated fetal weight (sEFW) formulas' accuracy for small-and large-for-gestational age (SGA/LGA) prediction in breech-presenting fetuses. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of all ultrasound-based fetal biometrical measurements performed within 3 days of delivery in term pregnancies, in one medical center (2007-2014). Overall, 274 breech- presenting fetuses (study group) were compared to 274 vertex-presenting fetuses (control group) matched by gender, gestational age and birth weight. sEFW was calculated by six previously published formulas. Accuracy was compared utilizing systematic error and random error for every formula. Prediction precision of SGA and LGA was evaluated by calculating each formula's sensitivity, specificity, +/- predictive value, and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: Systematic error and random error varied greatly between formulas, ranging from -7.4% to 3.1%, 7.3% to 8.3% for the vertex-presenting fetuses and -8.9% to 1.9%, 7.9% to 8.6% for the breech-presenting fetuses, respectively. There was no statistical difference in small-or large-forgestational age prediction parameters between the groups. The highest sensitivity and specificity for prediction was achieved by same formula regardless of presentation. Conclusion: In our cohort, overall accuracy was slightly superior among vertex-presenting fetuses without difference in prediction accuracy for small-and large-for-gestational age neonates.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Fetal mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness: a novel method for fetal weight estimation
    Abuelghar, Wessam
    Khairy, Ahmed
    El Bishry, Gasser
    Ellaithy, Mohamed
    Abd-Elhamid, Taha
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (06) : 1101 - 1108
  • [2] BADER B, 1987, J ULTRAS MED, V6, P437
  • [3] BERNSTEIN IM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P561
  • [4] Correlation of Fetal Abdominal Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness by Ultrasound to Predict Birth Weight
    Bhat, Rajeshwari G.
    Nathan, Anitha
    Amar, R.
    Vasudeva, Akhila
    Adiga, Prashanth
    Bhat, Parvati V.
    Kumar, Pratap N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (04) : OC9 - OC11
  • [5] Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial
    Boulvain, Michel
    Senat, Marie-Victoire
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Beucher, Gael
    Subtil, Damien
    Bretelle, Florence
    Azria, Elie
    Hejaiej, Dominique
    Vendittelli, Francoise
    Capelle, Marianne
    Langer, Bruno
    Matis, Richard
    Connan, Laure
    Gillard, Philippe
    Kirkpatrick, Christine
    Ceysens, Gilles
    Faron, Gilles
    Irion, Olivier
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9987) : 2600 - 2605
  • [6] SONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF BIRTH-WEIGHT AMONG BREECH PRESENTATIONS
    CHAUHAN, SP
    MAGANN, EF
    NAEF, RW
    MARTIN, JN
    MORRISON, JC
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) : 54 - 57
  • [7] CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .3. ABDOMINAL MEASUREMENTS
    CHITTY, LS
    ALTMAN, DG
    HENDERSON, A
    CAMPBELL, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02): : 125 - 131
  • [8] CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .4. FEMUR LENGTH
    CHITTY, LS
    ALTMAN, DG
    HENDERSON, A
    CAMPBELL, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02): : 132 - 135
  • [9] CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .2. HEAD MEASUREMENTS
    CHITTY, LS
    ALTMAN, DG
    HENDERSON, T
    CAMPBELL, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01): : 35 - 43
  • [10] Sonographic weight estimation in fetuses with breech presentation
    Dammer, U.
    Goecke, T. W.
    Voigt, F.
    Schmid, M.
    Mayr, A.
    Schild, R. L.
    Beckmann, M. W.
    Faschingbauer, F.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (05) : 851 - 858