Determinants of payout choice between open market repurchase, tender offer repurchase and special dividends

被引:0
作者
Varma, Urvashi [1 ]
Raveesh, K. [2 ]
Munjal, Alka [3 ]
机构
[1] Amity Univ, Amity Business Sch, J802,Sect 77, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] IIM, Bodhgaya, India
[3] Amity Univ Uttar Pradesh, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
来源
COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE | 2021年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
payout policy; multi nominal logit; open market repurchase; tender offer repurchase; FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY; DUTCH-AUCTION; CORPORATE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/23322039.2021.1934975
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper aims to identify the variables contributing to special payouts considering open market repurchase, tender offer repurchases, and special dividends. A multinomial logit model has been used to investigate the choice of payout out of 754 payout announcements made between 2004 and 2017 in India. The study investigates agency cost, shareholder heterogeneity, clientele effect, distribution size, misvaluation, and takeover threat. The MNL results suggest that open market repurchase is chosen when the takeover threat is high, firms are significant, or in case of undervaluation of firms. Tender offer repurchase is preferred in high agency cost, high takeover threat, low shareholder heterogeneity, and undervaluation. The study further investigates the nature of ownership in terms of a business group affiliated and standalone firms. The result of the study suggests the nature of ownership impacts the choice of dividend payout choice. Group affiliated firms are driven by clientele effect and distribution size, and in standalone firms' agency and shareholder heterogeneity holds. The Bayesian approach which is based on the combination of previous information and the current data available is used in the study for MNL. The findings suggest that payout choices of open market repurchase and tender offer repurchase over special dividends are based on misvaluation and shareholder heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   DUTCH AUCTION REPURCHASES - AN ANALYSIS OF SHAREHOLDER HETEROGENEITY [J].
BAGWELL, LS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (01) :71-105
[2]   SHARE REPURCHASE AND TAKEOVER DETERRENCE [J].
BAGWELL, LS .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1991, 22 (01) :72-88
[3]   Payout policy in the 21st century [J].
Brav, A ;
Graham, JR ;
Harvey, CR ;
Michaely, R .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (03) :483-527
[4]   SHAREHOLDER PREFERENCES AND DIVIDEND POLICY [J].
BRENNAN, MJ ;
THAKOR, AV .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1990, 45 (04) :993-1018
[5]   An empirical model of choice of one-time corporate cash disbursement methods [J].
Caudill, Steven ;
Hudson, Carl ;
Marshall, Beverly ;
Roumantzi, Anastasia .
STUDIES IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2006, 23 (01) :27-50
[6]   Price Behaviour around Share Buyback in the Indian Equity Market [J].
Chatterjee, Chanchal ;
Mukherjee, Paramita .
GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2015, 16 (03) :425-438
[7]   THE RELATIVE SIGNALING POWER OF DUTCH-AUCTION AND FIXED-PRICE SELF-TENDER OFFERS AND OPEN-MARKET SHARE REPURCHASES [J].
COMMENT, R ;
JARRELL, GA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1991, 46 (04) :1243-1271
[8]   Equity undervaluation and decisions related to repurchase tender offers: An empirical investigation [J].
D'Mello, R ;
Shroff, PK .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (05) :2399-2424
[9]   Share buybacks in India [J].
Dayanandan, Ajit ;
Donker, Han ;
Kuntluru, Sudershan ;
Nofsinger, John .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2020, 54
[10]  
DeMarzo B.J., 2008, FINANC MANAGE, P18