The expansion field:: the value of H0

被引:43
|
作者
Tammann, G. A. [1 ]
Sandage, A. [2 ]
Reindl, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Phys & Astron, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Observ Carnegie Inst Washington, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
来源
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS REVIEW | 2008年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
stars : population II; Cepheids; supernovae : general; distance scale; cosmological parameters;
D O I
10.1007/s00159-008-0012-y
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Any calibration of the present value of the Hubble constant (H-0) requires recession velocities and distances of galaxies. While the conversion of observed velocities into true recession velocities has only a small effect on the result, the derivation of unbiased distances which rest on a solid zero point and cover a useful range of about 4-30 Mpc is crucial. A list of 279 such galaxy distances within v < 2,000 km s(-1) is given which are derived from the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB), from Cepheids, and/or from supernovae of type Ia (SNe Ia). Their random errors are not more than 0.15 mag as shown by intercomparison. They trace a linear expansion field within narrow margins, supported also by external evidence, from v = 250 to at least 2,000 km s(-1). Additional 62 distant SNe Ia confirm the linearity to at least 20,000 km s(-1). The dispersion about the Hubble line is dominated by random peculiar velocities, amounting locally to < 100 km s(-1) but increasing outwards. Due to the linearity of the expansion field the Hubble constant H (0) can be found at any distance > 4.5 Mpc. RR Lyr star-calibrated TRGB distances of 78 galaxies above this limit give H (0) = 63.0 +/- 1.6 at an effective distance of 6 Mpc. They compensate the effect of peculiar motions by their large number. Support for this result comes from 28 independently calibrated Cepheids that give H-0 = 63.4 +/- 1.7 at 15 Mpc. This agrees also with the large-scale value of H-0 = 61.2 +/- 0.5 from the distant, Cepheid-calibrated SNe Ia. A mean value of H-0 = 62.3 +/- 1.3 is adopted. Because the value depends on two independent zero points of the distance scale its systematic error is estimated to be 6%. Other determinations of H-0 are discussed. They either conform with the quoted value (e.g. line width data of spirals or the D-n-sigma method of E galaxies) or are judged to be inconclusive. Typical errors of H-0 come from the use of a universal, yet unjustified P-L relation of Cepheids, the neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited samples, or they are inherent to the adopted models.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 331
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resolving the H0 tension with diffusion
    Perez, Alejandro
    Sudarsky, Daniel
    Wilson-Ewing, Edward
    GENERAL RELATIVITY AND GRAVITATION, 2021, 53 (01)
  • [42] SUPERNOVA STUDIES .4. THE GLOBAL VALUE OF H0 FROM SUPERNOVAE-IA AND THE PECULIAR MOTION OF FIELD GALAXIES
    TAMMANN, GA
    LEIBUNDGUT, B
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1990, 236 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [43] Cosmographic view on the H0 and σ8 tensions
    D'Agostino, Rocco
    Nunes, Rafael C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (02)
  • [44] H0 from Type Ia supernovae
    Tammann, GA
    Sandage, A
    Saha, A
    DECADE OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE, 2003, 14 : 222 - 246
  • [45] Auxiliary space preconditioning in H0(curl; Ω)
    R. Hiptmair
    G. Widmer
    J. Zou
    Numerische Mathematik, 2006, 103 : 435 - 459
  • [46] Robustness of H0 determination at intermediate redshifts
    Holanda, R. F. L.
    Busti, V. C.
    Pordeus da Silva, G.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 443 (01) : L74 - L78
  • [47] Cepheids, supernovae, H0, and the age of the universe
    Tammann, GA
    Reindl, B
    Thim, F
    Saha, A
    Sandage, A
    NEW ERA IN COSMOLOGY, 2002, 283 : 258 - 273
  • [48] Running Hubble tension and a H0 diagnostic
    Krishnan, C.
    Colgain, E. O.
    Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M.
    Yang, Tao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 103 (10)
  • [49] No H0 assistance from assisted quintessence
    Sabla, Vivian, I
    Caldwell, Robert R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 103 (10)
  • [50] Alleviating H0 tension in Horndeski gravity
    Petronikolou, Maria
    Basilakos, Spyros
    Saridakis, Emmanuel N.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (12)