The expansion field:: the value of H0

被引:43
|
作者
Tammann, G. A. [1 ]
Sandage, A. [2 ]
Reindl, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Phys & Astron, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Observ Carnegie Inst Washington, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
来源
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS REVIEW | 2008年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
stars : population II; Cepheids; supernovae : general; distance scale; cosmological parameters;
D O I
10.1007/s00159-008-0012-y
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Any calibration of the present value of the Hubble constant (H-0) requires recession velocities and distances of galaxies. While the conversion of observed velocities into true recession velocities has only a small effect on the result, the derivation of unbiased distances which rest on a solid zero point and cover a useful range of about 4-30 Mpc is crucial. A list of 279 such galaxy distances within v < 2,000 km s(-1) is given which are derived from the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB), from Cepheids, and/or from supernovae of type Ia (SNe Ia). Their random errors are not more than 0.15 mag as shown by intercomparison. They trace a linear expansion field within narrow margins, supported also by external evidence, from v = 250 to at least 2,000 km s(-1). Additional 62 distant SNe Ia confirm the linearity to at least 20,000 km s(-1). The dispersion about the Hubble line is dominated by random peculiar velocities, amounting locally to < 100 km s(-1) but increasing outwards. Due to the linearity of the expansion field the Hubble constant H (0) can be found at any distance > 4.5 Mpc. RR Lyr star-calibrated TRGB distances of 78 galaxies above this limit give H (0) = 63.0 +/- 1.6 at an effective distance of 6 Mpc. They compensate the effect of peculiar motions by their large number. Support for this result comes from 28 independently calibrated Cepheids that give H-0 = 63.4 +/- 1.7 at 15 Mpc. This agrees also with the large-scale value of H-0 = 61.2 +/- 0.5 from the distant, Cepheid-calibrated SNe Ia. A mean value of H-0 = 62.3 +/- 1.3 is adopted. Because the value depends on two independent zero points of the distance scale its systematic error is estimated to be 6%. Other determinations of H-0 are discussed. They either conform with the quoted value (e.g. line width data of spirals or the D-n-sigma method of E galaxies) or are judged to be inconclusive. Typical errors of H-0 come from the use of a universal, yet unjustified P-L relation of Cepheids, the neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited samples, or they are inherent to the adopted models.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 331
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AMPHOTERIC BEHAVIOR OF H0 IN GAAS
    PAVESI, L
    GIANNOZZI, P
    REINHART, FK
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1990, 42 (03): : 1864 - 1867
  • [32] H0 tension or M overestimation?
    Mazo, Brayan Yamid Del Valle
    Romano, Antonio Enea
    Quintero, Maryi Alejandra Carvajal
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2022, 82 (07):
  • [33] Testing the Swampland: H0 tension
    Colgain, Eoin O.
    Yavartanoo, Hossein
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2019, 797
  • [34] The Lorentz and CPT violating effects on the charged Higgs boson decays H+ → W+ H0 (h0, A0)
    Iltan, EO
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2005, 36 (10): : 2955 - 2967
  • [35] Towards a solution to the H0 tension
    de la Macorra, Axel
    Garrido, Joanna
    Almaraz, Erick
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 105 (02)
  • [36] A Critical Discussion on the H0 Tension
    Capozziello, Salvatore
    Sarracino, Giuseppe
    De Somma, Giulia
    UNIVERSE, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [37] Hot axions and the H0 tension
    D'Eramo, Francesco
    Ferreira, Ricardo Z.
    Notari, Alessio
    Bernal, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2018, (11):
  • [38] H0 tension or T0 tension?
    Ivanov, Mikhail M.
    Ali-Haimoud, Yacine
    Lesgourgues, Julien
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (06)
  • [39] H0 tension and the string swampland
    Anchordoqui, Luis A.
    Antoniadis, Ignatios
    Luest, Dieter
    Soriano, Jorge F.
    Taylor, Tomasz R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 101 (08)
  • [40] Screening away the H0 tension
    Beltran Jimenez, Jose
    Bettoni, Dario
    Brax, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2020, 29 (14):