The expansion field:: the value of H0

被引:43
|
作者
Tammann, G. A. [1 ]
Sandage, A. [2 ]
Reindl, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Phys & Astron, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Observ Carnegie Inst Washington, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
来源
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS REVIEW | 2008年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
stars : population II; Cepheids; supernovae : general; distance scale; cosmological parameters;
D O I
10.1007/s00159-008-0012-y
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Any calibration of the present value of the Hubble constant (H-0) requires recession velocities and distances of galaxies. While the conversion of observed velocities into true recession velocities has only a small effect on the result, the derivation of unbiased distances which rest on a solid zero point and cover a useful range of about 4-30 Mpc is crucial. A list of 279 such galaxy distances within v < 2,000 km s(-1) is given which are derived from the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB), from Cepheids, and/or from supernovae of type Ia (SNe Ia). Their random errors are not more than 0.15 mag as shown by intercomparison. They trace a linear expansion field within narrow margins, supported also by external evidence, from v = 250 to at least 2,000 km s(-1). Additional 62 distant SNe Ia confirm the linearity to at least 20,000 km s(-1). The dispersion about the Hubble line is dominated by random peculiar velocities, amounting locally to < 100 km s(-1) but increasing outwards. Due to the linearity of the expansion field the Hubble constant H (0) can be found at any distance > 4.5 Mpc. RR Lyr star-calibrated TRGB distances of 78 galaxies above this limit give H (0) = 63.0 +/- 1.6 at an effective distance of 6 Mpc. They compensate the effect of peculiar motions by their large number. Support for this result comes from 28 independently calibrated Cepheids that give H-0 = 63.4 +/- 1.7 at 15 Mpc. This agrees also with the large-scale value of H-0 = 61.2 +/- 0.5 from the distant, Cepheid-calibrated SNe Ia. A mean value of H-0 = 62.3 +/- 1.3 is adopted. Because the value depends on two independent zero points of the distance scale its systematic error is estimated to be 6%. Other determinations of H-0 are discussed. They either conform with the quoted value (e.g. line width data of spirals or the D-n-sigma method of E galaxies) or are judged to be inconclusive. Typical errors of H-0 come from the use of a universal, yet unjustified P-L relation of Cepheids, the neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited samples, or they are inherent to the adopted models.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 331
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The expansion field: the value of H0
    G. A. Tammann
    A. Sandage
    B. Reindl
    The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2008, 15 : 289 - 331
  • [2] Is there a concordance value for H0?
    Lukovic, Vladimir V.
    D'Agostino, Rocco
    Vittorio, Nicola
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2016, 595
  • [3] To H0 or not to H0?
    Efstathiou, George
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 505 (03) : 3866 - 3872
  • [4] Value of H0 in the Inhomogeneous Universe
    Ben-Dayan, Ido
    Durrer, Ruth
    Marozzi, Giovanni
    Schwarz, Dominik J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2014, 112 (22)
  • [5] H-II REGIONS AND THE VALUE OF H0
    TEERIKORPI, P
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1985, 143 (02) : 469 - 474
  • [6] The Value of H0 from Gaussian Processes
    Busti, Vinicius C.
    Clarkson, Chris
    Seikel, Marina
    STATISTICAL CHALLENGES IN 21ST CENTURY COSMOLOGY, 2015, 10 (306): : 25 - 27
  • [7] The local value of H0 in an inhomogeneous universe
    Odderskov, I.
    Koksbang, S. M.
    Hannestad, S.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (02):
  • [8] Larger value for H0 by an evolving gravitational constant
    Braglia, Matteo
    Ballardini, Mario
    Emond, William T.
    Finelli, Fabio
    Gumrukcuoglu, A. Emir
    Koyama, Kazuya
    Paoletti, Daniela
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (02):
  • [9] Cosmic expansion parametrization: Implication for curvature and H0 tension
    Dinda, Bikash R.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 105 (06)
  • [10] Supernovae and the large-scale value of H0
    Tammann, GA
    Reindl, B
    Thim, F
    COSMOLOGY AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2001, 555 : 226 - 242