Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm

被引:140
作者
Guo, Shenghan [1 ]
Agarwal, Mohit [2 ]
Cooper, Clayton [3 ]
Tian, Qi [4 ,5 ]
Gao, Robert X. [3 ]
Grace, Weihong Guo [5 ,6 ]
Guo, Y. B. [6 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Mfg Syst & Networks, Mesa, AZ 85212 USA
[2] Rutgers Univ New Brunswick, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Cleveland Hts, OH 44106 USA
[4] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[5] Rutgers Univ New Brunswick, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[6] Rutgers Univ New Brunswick, New Jersey Adv Mfg Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Machine learning; Deep learning; Additive manufacturing; Physics of manufacturing processes; POWDER-BED FUSION; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; ACOUSTIC-EMISSION; MELT-POOL; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ANOMALY DETECTION; LASER; PREDICTION; QUALITY; DEPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) has shown to be an effective alternative to physical models for quality prediction and process optimization of metal additive manufacturing (AM). However, the inherent "black box " nature of ML techniques such as those represented by artificial neural networks has often presented a challenge to interpret ML outcomes in the framework of the complex thermodynamics that govern AM. While the practical benefits of ML provide an adequate justification, its utility as a reliable modeling tool is ultimately reliant on assured consistency with physical principles and model transparency. To facilitate the fundamental needs, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has emerged as a hybrid machine learning paradigm that imbues ML models with physical domain knowledge such as thermomechanical laws and constraints. The distinguishing feature of PIML is the synergistic integration of data-driven methods that reflect system dynamics in real-time with the governing physics underlying AM. In this paper, the current state-of-the-art in metal AM is reviewed and opportunities for a paradigm shift to PIML are discussed, thereby identifying relevant future research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 163
页数:19
相关论文
共 189 条
  • [1] The manufacturing of hard tools from metallic powders by selective laser melting
    Abe, F
    Osakada, K
    Shiomi, M
    Uematsu, K
    Matsumoto, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 111 (1-3) : 210 - 213
  • [2] Abe F, ADV TECHNOLOGY PLAST, P1005
  • [3] Image Data-Based Surface Texture Characterization and Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches for Additive Manufacturing
    Akhil, V.
    Raghav, G.
    Arunachalam, N.
    Srinivas, D. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [4] Microstructures and mechanical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by selective laser melting
    Amato, K. N.
    Gaytan, S. M.
    Murr, L. E.
    Martinez, E.
    Shindo, P. W.
    Hernandez, J.
    Collins, S.
    Medina, F.
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2012, 60 (05) : 2229 - 2239
  • [5] Amato K.N., 2012, J MAT SCI RES, P3
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1976, United States Patent, Patent No. 19
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, ASTM52900-15, V3, P5
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2014, Operations and Production Systems with Multiple Objectives (1a Edicao)
  • [9] Adversarial attacks on machine learning cybersecurity defences in Industrial Control Systems
    Anthi, Eirini
    Williams, Lowri
    Rhode, Matilda
    Burnap, Pete
    Wedgbury, Adam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 58
  • [10] Simple method to construct process maps for additive manufacturing using a support vector machine
    Aoyagi, Kenta
    Wang, Hao
    Sudo, Hideki
    Chiba, Akihiko
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2019, 27 : 353 - 362