Do question prompts support students in working with peer feedback?

被引:12
作者
Jurkowski, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Sch Educ Focus Inclus Educ, Univ Str 10, D-78464 Constance, Germany
关键词
Peer feedback; Mindful cognitive processing; Question prompts; Academic writing; TEACHER FEEDBACK; HIGHER-EDUCATION; SELF; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijer.2018.07.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To benefit from peer feedback, students must engage in mindful cognitive processing of peer comments. In this study, 70 university students prepared an initial version of their term paper, revised their text based on peer feedback, and then submitted a final version of their term paper. In the experimental condition, students were supported in working with peer feedback by question prompts. Question prompts were not provided in the control condition. Students in the experimental condition reported a higher level of consideration of the received feedback, and they integrated more correct comments and less incorrect ones. However, question prompts did not result in a greater performance increase from the initial version to the final version of the term paper.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels [J].
Alqassab, Maryam ;
Strijbos, Jan-Willem ;
Ufer, Stefan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2018, 33 (01) :11-30
[2]  
BANGERTDROWNS RL, 1991, REV EDUC RES, V61, P213, DOI 10.3102/00346543061002213
[3]   Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: role of feedback-characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions [J].
Bolzer, M. ;
Strijbos, J. W. ;
Fischer, F. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2015, 31 (05) :422-434
[4]  
Boud D., 2000, STUD CONTIN EDUC, V22, P151
[5]   A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment [J].
Box, Cathy ;
Skoog, Gerald ;
Dabbs, Jennifer M. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (05) :956-983
[6]  
Cheng W., 2000, TEACH HIGH EDUC, V5, P243, DOI [10.1080/135625100114885, DOI 10.1080/135625100114885]
[7]   Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system [J].
Cho, Kwangsu ;
Schunn, Christian D. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2007, 48 (03) :409-426
[8]   Student revision with peer and expert reviewing [J].
Cho, Kwangsu ;
MacArthur, Charles .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2010, 20 (04) :328-338
[9]   RESTRUCTURING THE CLASSROOM - CONDITIONS FOR PRODUCTIVE SMALL-GROUPS [J].
COHEN, EG .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 64 (01) :1-35
[10]   Embedded Formative Assessment and Classroom Process Quality: How Do They Interact in Promoting Science Understanding? [J].
Decristan, Jasmin ;
Klieme, Eckhard ;
Kunter, Mareike ;
Hochweber, Jan ;
Buettner, Gerhard ;
Fauth, Benjamin ;
Hondrich, A. Lena ;
Rieser, Svenja ;
Hertel, Silke ;
Hardy, Ilonca .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (06) :1133-1159