Characteristics of funding of clinical trials: cross-sectional survey and proposed guidance

被引:45
作者
Hakoum, Maram B. [1 ]
Jouni, Nahla [2 ]
Abou-Jaoude, Eliane A. [3 ]
Hasbani, Divina Justina [4 ]
Abou-Jaoude, Elias A. [5 ]
Lopes, Luciane Cruz [6 ]
Khaldieh, Mariam [7 ]
Hammoud, Mira Zein [8 ]
Al-Gibbawi, Mounir [4 ]
Anouti, Sirine [9 ]
Guyatt, Gordon [10 ]
Akl, Elie A. [1 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Clin Res Inst, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Agr & Food Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Internal Med, Buffalo, NY USA
[4] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
[5] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA
[6] Univ Sorocaba, Grad Program Pharmaceut Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Sci, Beirut, Lebanon
[8] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[9] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Beirut, Lebanon
[10] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[11] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST; INDUSTRY SPONSORSHIP; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; IMPACT; ORGANIZATIONS; DISCLOSURE; CHALLENGES; INTERESTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015997
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To provide a detailed and current characterisation of funding of a representative sample clinical trials. We also aimed to develop guidance for standardised reporting of funding information. Methods We addressed the extent to which clinical trials published in 2015 in any of the 119 Core Clinical Journals included a statement on the funding source (eg, whether a not-for-profit organisation was supported by a private-for-profit organisation), type of funding, amount and role of funder. We used a stepwise approach to develop a guidance and an instrument for standardised reporting of funding information. Results Of 200 trials, 178 (89%) included a funding statement, of which 171 (96%) reported being funded. Funding statements in the 171 funded trials indicated the source in 100%, amount in 1% and roles of funders in 50%. The most frequent sources were governmental (58%) and private-for-profit (40%). Of 54 funding statements in which the source was a not-for-profit organisation, we found evidence of undisclosed support of those from private-for-profit organisation(s) in 26 (48%). The most frequently reported roles of funders in the 171 funded trials related to study design (42%) and data analysis, interpretation or management (41%). Of 139 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing pharmacological or surgical interventions, 29 (21%) reported information on the supplier of the medication or device. The proposed guidance addresses both the funding information that RCTs should report and the reporting process. Attached to the guidance is a fillable PDF document for use as an instrument for standardised reporting of funding information. Conclusion Although the majority of RCTs report funding, there is considerable variability in the reporting of funding source, amount and roles of funders. A standardised approach to reporting of funding information would address these limitations. Future research should explore the implications of funding by not-for-profit organisations that are supported by for-profit organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by Two Major Soda Companies [J].
Aaron, Daniel G. ;
Siegel, Michael B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (01) :20-30
[2]   Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey [J].
Akl, Elie A. ;
Carrasco-Labra, Alonso ;
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina ;
Neumann, Ignacio ;
Johnston, Bradley C. ;
Sun, Xin ;
Briel, Matthias ;
Busse, Jason W. ;
Ebrahim, Shanil ;
Granados, Carlos E. ;
Iorio, Alfonso ;
Irfan, Affan ;
Martinez Garcia, Laura ;
Mustafa, Reem A. ;
Ramirez-Morera, Anggie ;
Selva, Anna ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Sanabria, Andrea Juliana ;
Tikkinen, Kari A. O. ;
Vandvik, Per O. ;
Vernooij, Robin W. M. ;
Zazueta, Oscar E. ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (09)
[3]   Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials - A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? [J].
Als-Nielsen, B ;
Chen, WD ;
Gluud, C ;
Kjaergard, LL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (07) :921-928
[4]   Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research? [J].
Amiri, Amir Reza ;
Kanesalingam, Kavitha ;
Cro, Suzie ;
Casey, Adrian T. H. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (02) :308-314
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The Independent
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, NY Times
[7]   Financial disclosures of authors involved in spine research: an underestimated source of bias [J].
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. ;
Delye, Hans ;
Boogaarts, Jeroen .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (07) :1229-1233
[8]   Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: Why some statins appear more efficacious than others [J].
Bero, Lisa ;
Oostvogel, Fieke ;
Bacchetti, Peter ;
Lee, Kirby .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (06) :1001-1010
[9]  
Bhandari M, 2004, CAN MED ASSOC J, V170, P477
[10]   Disclosure of Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Phase III Surgical Trials: Survey of Ten General Surgery Journals [J].
Bridoux, Valerie ;
Moutel, Gregoire ;
Schwarz, Lilian ;
Michot, Francis ;
Herve, Christian ;
Tuech, Jean-Jacques .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (10) :2487-2493