Local References for Ultrasound-Estimated Fetal Weight Based on 2,211 Singleton Pregnancies in the City of Curitiba, South of Brazil

被引:1
作者
Pianovski Kato, Daniel Massamatsu [1 ]
Lorusso, Liziane [1 ]
Andrade Dalla Costa, Natalia Roberta [1 ]
Queiroz Ulyssea, Camila Rotter [1 ]
Lizana, Gabrielle Navarro [1 ]
Lenzi, Luana [1 ]
Bruns, Rafael Frederico [1 ]
Pinhat, Elisa Chicareli [2 ]
Araujo Junior, Edward [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Posit, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Obstet, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Municipal Sao Caetano do Sul, Med Course, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA | 2020年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
fetal weight; prenatal ultrasonography; growth charts; percentiles; reference curves; GROWTH; CHARTS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0040-1709691
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To develop reference curves of estimated fetal weight for a local population in Curitiba, South of Brazil, and compare them with the curves established for other populations. Methods An observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted. A reference model for estimated fetal weight was developed using a local sample of 2,211 singleton pregnancies with low risk of growth disorders and well-defined gestational age. This model was compared graphically with the Hadlock and Intergrowth 21st curves. Results Reference curves for estimated fetal weight were developed for a local population. The coefficient of determination was R-2 = 99.11%, indicating that 99.11% of the fetal weight variations were explained by the model. Compared with Hadlock curves, the 50th, 90th, and 97th percentiles in this model were lower, whereas the 10th percentile nearly overlapped, and the 3rd percentile was slightly higher in the proposed model. The percentiles were higher in the proposed model compared with the Intergrowth 21st curves, particularly for the 3rd, 10th, and 50th percentiles. Conclusion We provide a local reference curve for estimated fetal weight. The proposed model was different from other models, and these differences might be due to the use of different populations for model construction.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .1. METHODOLOGY [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
CHITTY, LS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01) :29-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LOW BIRTHW COUNTR RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CAD EST MUN CUR CUR
[4]   Reference Charts of Fetal Biometric Parameters in 31,476 Brazilian Singleton Pregnancies [J].
Araujo Junior, Edward ;
Martins Santana, Eduardo Felix ;
Martins, Wellington P. ;
Elito Junior, Julio ;
Ruano, Rodrigo ;
Pires, Claudio Rodrigues ;
Zanforlin Filho, Sebastiao Marques .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (07) :1185-1191
[5]   Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review [J].
Arcangeli, T. ;
Thilaganathan, B. ;
Hooper, R. ;
Khan, K. S. ;
Bhide, A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 40 (03) :267-275
[6]  
Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2012, CENS DEM 2010 CAR GE
[7]  
Cecatti J G, 2000, Cad Saude Publica, V16, P1083, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2000000400026
[8]   CUSTOMIZED ANTENATAL GROWTH CHARTS [J].
GARDOSI, J ;
CHANG, A ;
KALYAN, B ;
SAHOTA, D ;
SYMONDS, EM .
LANCET, 1992, 339 (8788) :283-287
[9]   Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure [J].
Gordijn, S. J. ;
Beune, I. M. ;
Thilaganathan, B. ;
Papageorghiou, A. ;
Baschat, A. A. ;
Baker, P. N. ;
Silver, R. M. ;
Wynia, K. ;
Ganzevoort, W. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 48 (03) :333-339
[10]   INUTERO ANALYSIS OF FETAL GROWTH - A SONOGRAPHIC WEIGHT STANDARD [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
MARTINEZPOYER, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) :129-133