Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle Presents Significant Differences Between Foot Types: A Biplane Fluoroscopy Study

被引:16
作者
Balsdon, Megan E. R. [1 ,2 ]
Bushey, Kristen M. [1 ,2 ]
Dombroski, Colin E. [3 ,4 ]
LeBel, Marie-Eve [5 ]
Jenkyn, Thomas R. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Fowler Kennedy Sport Med Clin, Wolf Orthopaed Biomech Lab, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Fowler Kennedy Sport Med Clin, SoleSci Inc, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[5] St Josephs Hosp, Roth McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, 268 Grosvenor St, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
[6] Western Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Kinesiol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2016年 / 138卷 / 10期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
medial longitudinal arch; biplane fluoroscopy; gait; foot kinematics; radiostereometric analysis; SEGMENT KINEMATIC MODEL; MOTION; GAIT; ACCURACY; REPEATABILITY; BAREFOOT; SUBTALAR; RSA;
D O I
10.1115/1.4034463
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The structure of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) affects the foot's overall function and its ability to dissipate plantar pressure forces. Previous research on the MLA includes measuring the calcaneal-first metatarsal angle using a static sagittal plane radiograph, a dynamic height-to-length ratio using marker clusters with a multisegment foot model, and a contained angle using single point markers with a multisegment foot model. The objective of this study was to use biplane fluoroscopy to measure a contained MLA angle between foot types: pes planus (low arch), pes cavus (high arch), and normal arch. Fifteen participants completed the study, five from each foot type. Markerless fluoroscopic radiostereometric analysis (fRSA) was used with a three-dimensional model of the foot bones and manually matching those bones to a pair of two-dimensional radiographic images during midstance of gait. Statistically significant differences were found between barefoot arch angles of the normal and pes cavus foot types (p = 0.036), as well as between the pes cavus and pes planus foot types (p = 0.004). Dynamic walking also resulted in a statistically significant finding compared to the static standing trials (p = 0.014). These results support the classification of individuals following a physical assessment by a foot specialist for those with pes cavus and planus foot types. The differences between static and dynamic kinematic measurements were also supported using this novel method.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Allen A-M., 2009, THESIS
[2]   The reliability, accuracy and minimal detectable difference of a multi-segment kinematic model of the foot-shoe complex [J].
Bishop, Chris ;
Paul, Gunther ;
Thewlis, Dominic .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2013, 37 (04) :552-557
[3]  
Campbell K. J., 2014, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V24, P1402
[4]   IMAGE INTENSIFIER DISTORTION CORRECTION [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1987, 14 (02) :249-252
[5]   Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity [J].
Deland, Jonathan T. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2008, 16 (07) :399-406
[6]   PES CAVUS AND PES PLANUS - ANALYSES AND TREATMENT [J].
FRANCO, AH .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (05) :688-694
[7]   Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction [J].
Geideman, WM ;
Johnson, JE .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 30 (02) :68-77
[8]   Dynamic in-vivo assessment of navicular drop while running in barefoot, minimalist, and motion control footwear conditions [J].
Hoffman, Scott E. ;
Peltz, Cathryn D. ;
Haladik, Jeffrey A. ;
Divine, George ;
Nurse, Matthew A. ;
Bey, Michael J. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (03) :825-829
[9]   Marker-based validation of a biplane fluoroscopy system for quantifying foot kinematics [J].
Iaquinto, Joseph M. ;
Tsai, Richard ;
Haynor, David R. ;
Fassbind, Michael J. ;
Sangeorzan, Bruce J. ;
Ledoux, William R. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2014, 36 (03) :391-396
[10]   A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking [J].
Jenkyn, T. R. ;
Nicol, A. C. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (14) :3271-3278