Research agendas of female and male academics: a new perspective on gender disparities in academia

被引:35
作者
Santos, Joao M. [1 ]
Horta, Hugo [2 ]
Amancio, Ligia [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Ctr Invest & Intervencao Social CIS IUL, Ave Forcas Armadas, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Fac Educ, Social Contexts & Policies Educ, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Research agendas; institutional characteristics; gender inequalities; academic profession; Collaboration; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; HIGHER-EDUCATION; WOMEN; SCIENCE; FACULTY; ADVANCEMENT; INEQUALITY; STRATEGIES; SOCIOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09540253.2020.1792844
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The presence of gender disparities in academia was assessed by analysing the characteristics of the research agendas of academics. Multivariate analysis of variance and structural equation modelling coupled with multi-group analysis were used to identify different gender trajectories. The research agenda preferences of women were less risky and less focused on fields likely to lead to scientific discovery, but were organised in a more collaborative way than those of men. In addition, institutional characteristics were found to influence the research agenda preferences of both women and men. However, the perceived autonomy allowed by a university was more important for female than for male academics to develop more ambitious, collaborative, risky and multidisciplinary efforts. Female academics also needed more time after completing their PhD to develop a preference for riskier research agendas, but past research outputs, the number of co-authors and mobility did not change their agendas.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 643
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Di Costa, Flavia .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 57 (02) :155-171
[2]   Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Caprasecca, Alessandro .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 79 (03) :517-539
[3]   HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations [J].
Acker, Joan .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1990, 4 (02) :139-158
[4]   Women academics and research productivity: an international comparison [J].
Aiston, Sarah Jane ;
Jung, Jisun .
GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2015, 27 (03) :205-220
[5]  
Allen A., 2013, The politics of our selves: Power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory
[6]   CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE AND INEQUALITY IN SCIENCE [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
LONG, JS ;
KRAUZE, TK .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 47 (05) :615-625
[7]  
Amery Fran., 2015, Advances in Gender Research, V20, P245, DOI DOI 10.1108/S1529-212620150000020022
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GENDER ED
[9]   Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers' scientific impact in science and medicine [J].
Beaudry, Catherine ;
Lariviere, Vincent .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) :1790-1817
[10]   The Academic Conference as a Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions [J].
Biggs, Jacklyn ;
Hawley, Patricia H. ;
Biernat, Monica .
SEX ROLES, 2018, 78 (5-6) :394-408