Comparing the efficacy and safety between propofol and dexmedetomidine for sedation in claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (PADAM trial)

被引:15
|
作者
Loh, Pui-San [1 ]
Ariffin, Mohd Azlan [1 ]
Rai, Vineya [1 ]
Lai, Lee-Lee [2 ]
Chan, Lucy [1 ]
Ramli, Norlisah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Anesthesiol, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Dept Nursing Sci, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Biomed Imaging, Res Imaging Ctr, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
Sedation; Claustrophobia; Propofol; Dexmedetomidine; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); ANXIETY; REDUCTION; MIDAZOLAM; CHILDREN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.074
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine the efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine compared to propofol for claustrophobic adults undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our institution. Design: Randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. Setting: University-based tertiary referral center. Patients: Thirty claustrophobic adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II who were planned for MRI. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to target-controlled infusion propofol or dexmedetomidine loading followed by maintenance dose for procedural sedation. Measurements and Main Results: The primary end point was adequate reduction in patient anxiety levels to allow successful completion of the MRI sequence. Both methods of sedation adequately reduced anxiety levels in visual analog scale scores and Spielberger Strait Test Anxiety Inventory (P <.001). Dexmedetomidine required a longer time to achieve anxiolysis, 7.36 minutes (SD, 2.59), and required increasing maintenance dose to induce sleep compared to 10.71 minutes (SD, 4.63) for propofol. In terms of image quality, 2 patients (16.67%) in the dexmedetomidine group were satisfactory, whereas all with propofol were graded as good to excellent. Adverse effects were seen in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine with number needed to harm 8 for hypotension and 15 for bradycardia compared to none recorded in the propofol arm. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction scores or home readiness after the MRI. Conclusions: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol can effectively reduce anxiety levels of claustrophobic adults undergoing MRI, but dexmedetomidine takes longer to achieve adequate anxiolysis and sleep and may have an effect on image quality. Hypotension and bradycardia are common adverse effects observed with dexmedetomidine. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety challenges related to the use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examinations
    Artunduaga, Maddy
    Liu, C. Amber
    Morin, Cara E.
    Serai, Suraj D.
    Udayasankar, Unni
    Greer, Mary-Louise C.
    Gee, Michael S.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (05) : 724 - 735
  • [32] Hippocampal volume and recovery profile following propofol sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: An exploratory study
    Srinivasa, Navyashree Krishnashastry
    Mishra, Rajeeb Kumar
    Bhadrinarayan, Varadarajan
    Kulanthaivelu, Karthik
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (01) : 12 - 16
  • [33] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation protocols with the use of dexmedetomidine–remifentanil and propofol–remifentanil during percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: a randomized clinical trial
    Xiao-Lan Chen
    Wen-Hui Huang
    Yi-Han Zheng
    Gui-Can Zhang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [34] Comparison of airway collapsibility following single induction dose ketamine with propofol versus propofol sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A randomised controlled study
    Bhardwaj, Pooja
    Panneerselvam, Sakthirajan
    Rudingwa, Priya
    Govindaraj, Kirthiha
    Prakash, M. V. S. Satya
    Badhe, Ashok S.
    Nagarajan, Krishnan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [35] Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Shang-xian Xu
    Xi-sheng Shan
    Jin-meng Gao
    Hua-xian Liu
    Wei-rong Chen
    Shan-shan Gao
    Fu-hai Ji
    Ke Peng
    Qian Wang
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [36] Comparison of single-shot nebuliser protocol between dexmedetomidine and ketamine in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Geetha, K.
    Padhy, Shibani
    Karishma, K.
    JOURNAL OF PERIOPERATIVE PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (12) : 346 - 353
  • [37] The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute stroke A prospective randomized control trial
    Wu, Bin
    Hu, Hongping
    Cai, Ailan
    Ren, Chunguang
    Liu, Shengjie
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (21)
  • [38] Evaluation of the Efficacy of Propofol-Magnesium Sulfate Combination for Sedation in Paediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain.- a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Lomate, Prashant Atmaram
    Kumbhar, Ganesh Mallappa
    Paranjpe, Jyotsna Satish
    SRI LANKAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 30 (01): : 46 - 51
  • [39] Median Effective Dose of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Rescue Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Wenhua
    Fan, Yanting
    Zhao, Tianyun
    Chen, Jinghui
    Zhang, Gaolong
    Song, Xingrong
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 125 (06) : 1130 - 1135
  • [40] Effect of Music Interventions on Sedation in Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Clinical Trial
    Mathur, Ambika
    Kamat, Aarti
    Philp, Blythe
    Tabb, Jennifer
    Thomas, Ronald
    Mahajan, Prashant
    Caldwell, John
    Kamat, Deepak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILD HEALTH AND NUTRITION, 2016, 5 (02): : 63 - 74